Laserfiche WebLink
3. Quality and depth of references. <br />4. Previously demonstrated ability to successfully manage the installation of a CAD and/or JMS <br />solution. <br />5. Level of service and responsiveness that [he vendor commits to providing to the City. <br />6. Financial stability and resources of the vendor. <br />7. Experience and technical expertise of staff. <br />8. Design, capability, and functionality of system and application sofrware as determined by the <br />evaluation team. <br />9. Current availability and ability to demonstrate installation of the proposed software applications <br />required by the City. <br />10. Level of integration between applications and demonstrated interfaces with external systems/devices. <br />11. Capability, design, reliability, warranty and expandability of proposed hardware. <br />12. Economic feasibility and justification of all costs. <br />13. Vendor willingness and ability to negotiate a contract acceptable to the City. <br />14. Feasibility, timeliness and quality of sofrware implementation schedule and conversion plans. <br />15. Level of assistance to be provided to the City by the vendor during the implementation process as par[ <br />of the contract. <br />16. The number of hours and extent of user training. <br />17. Quality and extent of the documentation to be provided. <br />Additionally, information pertaining to each major area of the specifications would be <br />summarized, evaluated and ranked. Additional information and clarification would be obtained <br />from responding vendors as required. Finally, the list of vendors would be narrowed to two semi- <br />finalist vendors who would be further evaluated though vendor demonstrations, operational site <br />visits, reference checks and oral interviews. Based upon the proposal and subsequent analysis, <br />Cit Com would recommend the company whose system(s) and equipment best meet the overall <br />requirements of the City in a Finalist Recommendation Report. The Finalist Recommendation <br />Report would be submitted both in writing and orally to the project's governance, allowing an <br />opportunity to discuss the content of the report. <br />Deliverables would include <br />- Request for Proposal (drafr and final) <br />- Pre-Proposal Conference Questions and Answers <br />- Evaluation Matrix <br />- Finalist Recommendation Report <br />15 <br />