Laserfiche WebLink
adequately notified as to the meetings and she didn't realize <br />that pressure in numbers counted in something like this; she <br />requested a continuance to an evening meeting because many <br />people work during the day. <br /> <br />Councilman Griset moved that the matter be referred to the <br />Board of Recreation and Parks for recommendation and resolution. <br />The motion was seconded by Councilman Garthe and carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Patterson requested that staff provide Council with a <br />report of the incidents of vandalism to the Bowling Green <br />and its club house. (CA S2) <br /> <br />TRAFFIC LIGHT The letter dated March <br />WARNER & HALLADAY 30, 1974 from ITT-Cannon <br /> Electric and report dated <br /> April 10, 1974, from the <br />Assistant Director of Public Works, recommending that signali- <br />zation of the interesection of Warner and Dyer with Halladay <br />be constructed in accordance with the Public Works Department <br />traffic priority list was referred to staff for continued <br />study and re-evaluation of priorities, and staff was instructed <br />to look into alternatives, such as developer participation, <br />for traffic light installation, on motion of Councilman Garthe, <br />seconded by Councilman Ward, and unanimously carried. Mr. <br />Don Gilchrist and Mr. Edward Black, representing ~TT~Cannon~ <br />addressed Council, requesting that a traffic light Be installed <br />at the intersection of Warner and Halladay because of rapid <br />development and increased traffic in the area. fCA 18.3) <br /> <br />STREET IMPROVEMENT The letter dated April <br />REIMBURSEMENT 10, 1974 from Harold T. <br />MAC ARTHUR BOULEVARD Segerstrom, et al. <br /> stating their position <br />that a contractual commitment exists between the City and the <br />Segerstroms for the expense of improvement of MacArthur Boule- <br />vard to ultimate width of right-of-way which the Segerstroms <br />had dedicated to the City on May 14, 1971, was considered by <br />Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Henry Segerstrom orally reviewed the major points of the <br />letter with Council, emphasizing that the land necessary for <br />widening MacArthur had been dedicated under an existing street <br />improvement reimbursement policy; that the City had not pro- <br />ceeded with the improvements; and that subsequently the <br />street improvement reimbursement policy had been discontinued <br />without notification to the Segerstroms. <br /> <br />Council continued the matter for three weeks to its May 6, 1974 <br />meeting, and directed the staff to prepare a report to be sub- <br />mitted at the May 6 meeting, a copy of which is to be sent to <br />the Segerstroms one week before the meeting, on the unanimously <br />carried motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman <br />Griset. (CA 29.4) <br /> <br />RELOCATION BENEFITS <br />FOR DISPLACED TENANT <br /> <br />as a displaced tenant. She <br />differential allowed by the <br />view of the fact that her present <br />more than her former rental costs. <br /> <br />Ms. Helen Klein, 1716 <br />North McClay Street, <br />addressed Council regard- <br />ing benefits allowed her <br />stated that the $6 per month rent <br />City is not a fair allowance in <br /> rental costs are $35 per month <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 142 APRIL 15, 1974 <br /> <br /> <br />