05-05-1975 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION The letter of RESIGNATION OF TOM MC MICHAEL resignation from APPOINTMENT OF JOHN COIL Tom McMichael resigning from the Community Redevelopment Commission was received and filed on the motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Brandt and carried (7-0). On the motion of Councilman Ward, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, Mr. John Coil was appointed to replace Mr. McMichael and complete his term of office which expires June 50, 1978; the motion carried [7-0). CA 82.1 CITY YOUTH COMMISSION Discussion of the City Marrager's report dated April 28, 1975, regarding a proposed Youth Commission, was continued to June 16, 197S, and the City Manager was instructed to solicit the reaction of the City's various Boards and Commissions, through their chairmen, to the possible appointment to their Commission of an ~x-~fficio youth member, on the unanimously carried (7-0) motion of Coun- cilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Brandt. CA 131.12 P~QUEST FOR 2-HOUR The Director of PARKING ON VAN NESS Public Works was (REFERRAL ITEM #190) instructed to post the east side of Van Ness between Third and Fourth Streets for a two-hour parking time limit as an interim measure pending completion of the Civic Center Plan updating; Item #190 was deleted from the Council Referral Summary, on the motion of Coun- cilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Ortiz, and carried (6-12 with Councilman Yamamoto dissenting. CA 18 BOARDS ~ COMMISSIONS The attendance ATTENDANCE REPORTS reports of the City's Boards and Commissions were received and filed on the unanimously carried [7-0) motion of Councilman Evans and seconded by Councilman Ward. Councilman Bricken req~sted that staff develop a standard reporting form and Councilman Evans suggested that seats be declared vacated in a timely manner when excessive unexcused absences occur, so that the City's Boards and Commissions will be fully staffed at all times. CA 80.9 AMENDMENT TO The reports of REDEVELOPMENT PLAN the Planning Commission and the Redevelopment Commission on the proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Plan to the City's Redevelopment Project Area, dated April 9 and April 11, 1975, respectively, together with the Planning Commission Resolution No. 606?, and Resolu- tion No. ?5-3 of the Community Redevelopment Commission, both approving and recommending adoption of the proposed amendment, were received and filed on the unanimously carried [?-0) motion of. Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Ward. CA 82.10 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 180 MAY 5, 1975