Laserfiche WebLink
The speakers favoring retention of the wall were: <br /> <br />Ed Tornell, 1717 North Heliotrope; <br /> <br />Tom Cox, 1919 North Heliotrope; <br /> <br />Margie Fluor, 1920 North Heliotrope; <br /> <br />Robert Wright, 2013 North Heliotrope; <br /> <br />Angelo Peykoff, 1927 North Heliotrope; <br /> <br />Mrs. John Madden, 2319 North Rosewood; <br /> <br />Robert Lowrey, 2102 North Heliotrope; <br /> <br />Mrs. Herbert Miller, 2008 North Heliotrope; and <br /> <br />Gloria Turkwalled, 842 East McFadden <br /> <br />The proponents of the wall stated that they wished to maintain <br />the separation between residential and commercial property; <br />that they wished to maintain the quiet residential street; <br />that the two occupants of residences on the south side of <br />the wall made the decision in 1969 to stay on the south side <br />after having been given their choice; that the wall has <br />reduced the crime rate. Mr. Lowrey presented a petition in <br />favor of retention of the wall, signed by the 39 Heliotrope <br />residents who live north of the wall to Santa Clara. <br /> <br />Councilmen Evans, Ward, Bricken and Yamamoto spoke in favor of <br />maintaining the wall, to separate residential from commercial <br />property, and to maintain the increased safety of the neighbor- <br />hood which has resulted from the installation of the wall. <br /> CA 29.1 <br /> <br />PETITION OF COMPLAINT <br />BOARD & CARE RESIDENTS <br />2523 W. BERN LANE <br /> <br />neighbors complaining about <br />and care residents at 2323, <br /> <br />The City Council <br />responded to a petition <br />containing signatures <br />of 78 residential <br />the disturbance caused by board <br />2401 and 2409 West Bern Lane with <br /> <br />the following motion by Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by <br />Councilman Brandt, and unanimously (7-0) carried: <br /> <br />Directed the Planning Department to monitor the <br />enforcement action of the Welfare Licensing Divi- <br />sion and to report back to the Council the findings <br />and actions of that agency; <br /> <br />Instructed the staff to <br />remedies because of the <br />Act; and <br /> <br />seek out potential legal <br />overuse of the Lanterman <br /> <br />Instructed the staff to pursue the possibility <br />with local legislators of amendments to the <br />Lant'erman Act that would further enhance the <br />ability to enforce it. <br /> <br />The City Attorney was instructed to prepare a resolution stating <br />in principle that Council finds that the concentration of day <br />care facilities is a burden to the neighborhood; that the con- <br />centration creates institutional fear; that such concentration <br />is not consistent with court interpretation; that the Council <br />recommends to the County Board of Supervisors and to the State <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />430 OCTOBER 6, 1975 <br /> <br /> <br />