Laserfiche WebLink
Legislature that they create new standards or legislation to <br />limit the concentration of these day care homes in one <br />neighborhood by providing that they be separated by 500 feet, <br />in a further motion by Councilman Ward, seconded by Council- <br />man Bricken and unanimously (7-0) carried. <br /> <br />Speakers who appeared in support of the written petition were: <br /> <br />Ed Culbert, 2402 W. Laurie Lane <br />Mary Cooke, 2421 West Bern Lane <br />Carole Culbert, 2402 W. Laurie Lane <br />Aurora Martinez, 2422 West Downie Place <br />Beverly Altes, 2425 West Bern Lane <br />Carlos Martinez, 2422 West Downie Place <br /> <br />The speakers informed Council that there were 18 mentally dis- <br />turbed people housed in three adjacent homes; that they have <br />been disturbed by numerous incidents of undesirable behavior <br />enumerated in the petition; that they have young children <br />they do not wish to have exposed to this behavior; and that <br />they are here to seek help from the Council. <br /> <br />Keith Gow, City Attorney, stated his opinion that the intent of <br />the Lanterman Act to house mentally disturbed persons in a <br />residential environment, was being violated in spirit by the <br />allowance of three homes in a row in one neighborhood. <br /> <br />The Council expressed agreement with the petitioners and generally <br />favored all possible attempts to aid in the correction of the <br />problem. <br /> <br />Police Chief Davis advised Council of his <br />the residents of these homes for indecent <br />their diminished mental capacity. <br /> <br />inability to prosecute <br />exposure because of <br /> CA 78 <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR ORDINANCE <br />PROHIBITING PORNOGRAPHIC <br />THEATERS IN SANTA ANA <br /> <br />by Lee Ogorek, in her letter of <br />unanimously (7-0) approving the <br />Councilman Brandt <br /> <br /> The City Council responded <br /> to the request of numerous <br /> residents of northwest <br /> Santa Aha represented <br /> September 15, 1975, by <br /> following motion made by <br />and seconded by Councilman Bricken: <br /> <br />Instructed the City Attorney to prepare a resolu- <br />tion similar to Resolution No. 75-109 adopted <br />August 18, 1975, and after it has been re-worded <br />to transmit a copy to every member of the Assembly <br />with a cover letter expressing the City Council's <br />sincere and strong support for Senate Bill 886; <br /> <br />Instructed the City Attorney to contact the City <br />of San Bruno to ascertain what methods they used <br />to close down their porno theater, if in fact <br />it has taken place, or if it is merely a temporary <br />thing to be held up in the courts; <br /> <br />Authorized the Mayor to write to the Mitchell <br />Brothers and to United Artists stating the City's <br />position in opposition to this type of movie house; <br /> <br />Authorized the Mayor to write to the School Dis- <br />tricts, Santa Ana and Rancho Santiago Junior <br />College, that the City Council concurs with their <br />opposition and encourages that no public funds be <br />used in support of the porno movie theaters; <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />431 <br /> <br />OCTOBER 6, 1975 <br /> <br /> <br />