Laserfiche WebLink
Department and Disaster Services, Building Maintenance and <br />Equipment Maintenance. <br /> <br />Hr. Andrusky stated that the Budget and Management Analysis <br />Division plans to initiate improvements in budget preparation <br />and monitoring during the coming fiscal year, including a <br />study on the City's duplicating processes; that $5,000 has <br />been requested for consultant services for financial and pro- <br />ductivity studies. <br /> <br />In reviewing the Personnel Department budget, he noted that the <br />department would be responsible for the City's self-insured risk <br />management program for Workmens Compensation and liability, in- <br />cluding an aggressive safety training program for employees. <br />The budget also includes a request for a computerized personnel <br />system estimated at $21,000. <br /> <br />The Finance Department budget increase is minimal and an important <br />contributing factor is the judicious use of CETA personnel in <br />trainee positions, according to the Deputy City Manager. He also <br />stated that an analysis of the impact of the loss of CETA person- <br />nel in all departments and the phasing out of CETA programs will <br />be provided to the Council during the next fiscal year. <br /> <br />Mr. Andrusky described the Disaster Services Division as being <br />50% federally funded. Building Maintenance was described as a <br />revolving account, with service charges levied against each <br />department's activity. He stated that 355,000 square feet of <br />area are presently maintained; and that the possibility of con- <br />tract services is being explored. He attributed the increases <br />in the Equipment Maintenance budget to major increases in <br />materials and supplies, particularly gasoline. The budget also <br />requests funds for improvement in lighting and fencing at the <br />Corporation Yard. <br /> <br />Councilman Bricken arrived at 8:05 P.M. <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Deputy City Manager G. <br />PROPOSED BUDGET David Tayco referred to <br /> pages 65 through 83 <br /> and 229 - 230. He <br />stated that the budgets for the various departments included <br />in Development Services exceeded $17 million, representing <br />33% of the City Budget; that 49 CETA personnel were employed <br />within these departments; that no new programs or significant <br />expansion is contemplated. <br /> <br />In reviewing the Building Department budget, he pointed out <br />the request for one additional position, an Energy Conservation <br />Engineer, to implement a new program mandated by recent State <br />legislation to require the application of energy conservation <br />design to all non-residential buildings. He emphasized that the <br />entire cost of the program would be fully compensated for by <br />user charges. <br /> <br />Referring to statistical charts, Mr. Tayco compared this City's <br />Building Department operation with the 20 largest California <br />cities, excluding San Francisco, indicating better than average <br />performance in level of service, efficiency and productivity <br />at a below average operating cost. <br /> <br />In his review of the budget for the Department of Public Works, <br />Mr. Tayco cited the elimination of 7 positions during fiscal <br />year 1975-76, and stated that personnel reorganization, effec- <br />tive fiscal year 1976-77 would result in a $57,000 annual <br />saving. $1,500 has been requested for office remodeling and a <br />new account for emergency repair to bicycle trails in the amount <br />of $4,790 is recommended. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />219 JUNE 14, 1976 <br /> <br /> <br />