My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-1976
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1976
>
08-24-1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 1:59:09 PM
Creation date
5/7/2003 2:31:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/24/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Information Officer Frank Blaszcak suggested that the <br />real issue is not the Lionettes supplemental agreement, but <br />the future of the stadium, and ultimately the development <br />-of the proposed culture/sports center for the City. He <br />stated that maximum visibility use of the stadium will bene- <br />fit the City, including the Lionettes playoffs and CIP foot- <br />ball; that future negotiations with other professional groups, <br />including those now in progress with the Santa Aha Soccer <br />Club, will be affected by Council's decision; and asked <br />Council "Where do we go from here?" <br /> <br />Dave Valentine, Athletic Director of Santa Ana College, <br />expressed concurrence with the SAUSD representatives that <br />the stadit~m.should be resodded and utilized as a football <br />stadium; and added that it should be seriously considered <br />as a facility for professional soccer. <br /> <br />Ernie Brown, Santa Aha resident and past President of the <br />Santa Ana High School Booster Club, stated that he represents <br />500 interested and irate parents in the Santa Aha High School <br />area who basically want to cause the honoring of the original <br />Lionettes contract and replacement of the sod as scheduled; <br />that CIF has stringent scheduling requirements; that he is <br />sure that the signatures of a very large number of Santa Ana <br />citizens (parents and school officials) could be obtained <br />expressing their desire that the Bowl be kept intact as a <br />football stadium. <br /> <br />At 5:50 P.M. Vice Mayor Evans closed the informal hearing; in <br />response to the Vice Mayor's question, City Attorney Gow replied <br />that Councilman Bricken, who was not present during the fore- <br />going commentary, would be eligible to vote on the matter, <br />and that four affirmative votes would be required for Council <br />action. <br /> <br />Council discussion follows: <br /> <br />Councilman Ward said that he is very interested in encouraging <br />maximum multi-purpose use of the Bowl;--however that he recog- <br />nizes the immediate problems of SAUSD, and the City's unwritten <br />commitment to f~otball. <br /> <br />Councilman Brandt expressed his opinion that new sod would <br />present a greater hazard than the skinned area; his disap- <br />pointment with a lack of cooperation between the various <br />groups in the interest of the City as a whole; and his regret <br />that the problems had not been foreseen by all of the parties <br />involved. <br /> <br />Councilman Bricken remarked that Council has an obligation to <br />balance the multiple needs of the community; that changing <br />needs require adaptability and cooperation on the part of <br />community groups; he also concurred with Councilman Brandt <br />that multi-use of the stadium is in the City's best interest; <br />and that the skinned area is probably safer than new sod. <br />Further, he questioned whether the speakers for SAUSD repre- <br />sented the official decision making position of the District. <br /> <br />Councilman Yamamoto concurred with Councilman Ward's statements, <br />and added that he did not support the original agreement with <br />the Lionettes, and could not support the amendment. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Evans stated his commitment to honor all existing <br />agreements. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 525 AUGUST 24, 1976 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.