Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Variance No. 2005-01 <br />February 14, 2005 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The parking requirement for medical office is six spaces for each 1,000 <br />square feet and general office requires three spaces for each 1,000 square <br />feet of gross floor area for a total of 12 on-site parking spaces required <br />for this proj ect. As proposed the proj ect meets the on-site parking <br />requirements. <br /> <br />The architectural design of the building reflects a contemporary design <br />(Exhibits 5 and 6) with high quality materials and finishes. As proposed, <br />the exterior design elements of the building include a smooth stucco <br />finish, plaster cornice treatment, granite tile and marble, and lighting <br />accents. Additionally, metal canopies will be utilized as accents at the <br />primary entrances. <br /> <br />Analysis of the Issues <br /> <br />Professional zone development standards require all structures to maintain <br />a 15-foot setback along front yards and on side yards abutting a street. <br />The applicant's original proposal complied with all development standards, <br />including front and side yard setbacks. Staff analysis found that due to <br />the small lot size and corner location, the on-site circulation design was <br />not efficient and that the setbacks, in this location, resulted in a <br />building configuration that was not consistent with the existing <br />development pattern along Civic Center Drive. The variance will allow the <br />applicant to move the building to within three-feet of the property line <br />on Ross Street and Civic Center Drive. <br /> <br />Staff performed a survey of the existing front yard setbacks of nine <br />adjacent buildings along the north side of Civic Center Drive (Exhibit 7). <br />One building has an approximate setback of 25 feet, another has a 15-foot <br />setback and an additional building has a five-foot setback. The remaining <br />six buildings have zero setbacks, including the buildings immediately <br />adjacent to the east and west. Based on the survey, staff determined that <br />the best site design was to move the building footprint closer to the <br />property line to follow the existing pattern of development. By shifting <br />the building south, more space could be utilized to improve on-site <br />circulation and allow for easier vehicle flow entering and exiting the <br />site. As proposed, the building footprint will be consistent with the <br />existing development pattern and will result in positive impacts to the <br />neighboring properties. <br /> <br />31A-3 <br />