02-07-1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION NO. 77-16 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING RESOLU- TION NO. 58-281 TO ESTABLISH A NEW ASSIGNMENT PAY DIFFERENTIAL, ADD A NEW TYPIST CLERK CLASS, AND PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN OTHER REVISIONS TO THE TYPIST CLERK SERIES OF CLASSES. CA 50.1 RESOLUTION ??-17 The following resolu- REJECTING A CERTAIN CLAIM tion was unanimously ADOPTED adopted 6:0, on the motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Bricken: RESOLUTION NO. 77-17 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REJECTING A CERTAIN CLAIM HERETOFORE FILED AGAINST THE CITY. CA 65.7b TAX COLLECTOR'S SALE #2130 On the motion of CONSENTED TO SALE Councilman Evans, seconded by Council- man Bricken, and carried 6:0 unanimously, Council consented to the sale of AP 408-103-40 by the Orange County Tax Collector. CA 45.3 DEATH PENALTY LEGISLATION Mayor Garthe was LEAGUE OF CITIES RESOLUTION authorized to support AUTHORIZED SUPPORT Orange County Division, League of Cities Reso- lution No. 2-?? in support of death penalty legislation which is consistent with U. S. Supreme Court decision guide- lines, on the motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Council- man Bricken, and carried 5:1, with Councilman Ward dissenting. The resolution was submitted to the Council by Milan Dostal, Chairman, Division Resolutions Committee, with his letter of January 25, 1977 asking that delegates be prepared to vote at the Executive Committee meeting February 10, 1977. CA S? CA 148.1 ANNEXATION - SANTA ANA RIVER- On the motion of HARBOR-FOUNTAIN VALLEY LIMITS Councilman Evans, REFERRED; REFERRAL 32-76 DELETED seconded by Council- man Ward, and carried 6:0 unanimously, the proposed annexation of territory between Santa Ana River, Harbor Boulevard, and the Fountain Valley City Limits North of Edinger Avenue was referred to Staff to incorporate whatever is necessary to prepare the matter'for election; the Staff was directed to prepare two proposals, one with a condition that the property owners assume the costs of certain public imrpovements, such as necessary drainage and street lighting, and one proposal without any condition precedent to annexation. Council Referral Item No. 32-76 was also deleted from the Summary by the foregoing motion. One of the property owners of the area was present. Mrs. E. J. Euranich stated that she would prefer to annex to Santa Aha and feels that others would also like to annex to this City. CA 94 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 48 FEBRUARY 7, 1977