07-14-1975 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. 8 . . . 8 . market and proposed use most beneficial to that piece of land. It was moved by Mr. Ward and seconded by Mr. Bricken that the Request for Proposals be approved and that the Executive Director be authorized to distribute the RFP's to consultants. Motion passed unanimously. BIENNIAL HEARING In accordance with the Health and Safety Code, the Agency established September 2, 1975 at 2:00 P.M. as the date for the biennial hearing to be held on progress of the Redevelopment Project Area. The meeting will be held in the City Council Cham- bers of Santa Ana, California. ELECTION OF OFFICERS It was moved by Mr. Evans and seconded by Mr. Ward that Mr. Garthe be elected as Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency for the period of July 14,1975 through June 30, 1976. The motion was unanimously adopted by the Agency. It was moved by Mr. Ward and seconded by Mr. Yamamoto that Mr. Evans be elected as Vice Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency for the period of July 14,1975 through June 30, 1976. This motion was unanimously supported by the Agency. DEMOLITION CONTRACT Because the Agency has completed acquisition of the senior citi- zen site and the remaining relocation is almost completed, the Executive Director requested authorization from the Agency to request that demolition bids be sought. It was moved by Mr. Bricken and seconded by Mr. Ortiz that the Executive Director seek demolition bids. The motion was unanimously supported by the Redevelopment Agency. UNFINISHED BUSINESS It was moved by Mr. Yamamoto and seconded by Mr. Garthe that the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency support the fund- ing of the County Administration Building through the civic Center and a lease revenue bond issue. The Agency unanimously adopted this motion. KRAMER BUILDING At the request of Mr. Bricken, the Executive Director reported that specifications had been drawn up to correctly tie the Kramer Building wall to the adjoining building if the Kramer Building were to be removed in demolition; however, he did report that the Agency staff was negotiating with the owners of the adjacent buildings because, in analyzing the cost of tying the Kramer Build- ing properly to the party wall, (that would cost $6000) it may be better to put that money toward ownership of the two adjoining buildings. If a larger site were aggregated, it would be possible that the entire area could be sold for redevelopment purposes.