|
time is $1,184,$79; therefore a lump-sum payoff will require
<br />$921,379 to be added to the retirement budget.
<br />
<br />Councilman Yamamoto's motion, seconded by Councilman Brandt,
<br />to allocate an additional $921,379 to the retirement budget
<br />from the $2,632,500 that the City will be receiving from the
<br />State, and to pay the entire amount in a lump-sum one year
<br />payment in fiscal year 1978-79, was approved 4:1, with Council-
<br />man Bricken dissenting.
<br />
<br />A subsequent motion by Councilman Bricken, seconded by Vice
<br />Mayor Ward, to adopt a policy that the City will not treat the
<br />retirement debt as if it were a bonded obligation, (an available
<br />alternative but one that would impose a tax upon the City's
<br />property owners), was unanimously approved 5:0. CA 50.20
<br />
<br />GENERAL REVENUE SHARING The proposed General
<br />APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED Revenue Sharing Budget,
<br /> described on Pages 12
<br /> 15 of the Preliminary
<br />Budget, in the total amount of $2,700,500 was approved on the
<br />unanimously carried S:0 motion of Councilman Bricken, seconded
<br />by Vice Mayor Ward.
<br />
<br />During the discussion on the General Revenue Sharing Budget, the
<br />consensus was that no GRS moneys should be used for operating
<br />costs and that the $99,000 deleted from the Police Department
<br />Building Alterations budget activity (401-116 and 621) should be
<br />returned to General Revenue Sharing to be reallocated for other
<br />uses. CA 65B; CA l12A
<br />
<br />CAPITAL PROGRAM The proposed Capital Pro-
<br />REDUCED BY $860,000 gram budget, in the amount
<br /> of $2,465,995, was reduced
<br /> by $860,000 on the unani-
<br />mously carried 5:0 motion of Councilman Bricken, seconded by
<br />Councilman Yamamoto, subject to converting $99,000 from General
<br />Revenue Sharing funds to Capital program purposes, for a net
<br />reduction of $761,000, with the total capital budget being re-
<br />duced to a total of $1,605,995. CA 6SB
<br />
<br />USE OF CITY VEHICLES The City Manager directed
<br />JUSTIFICATION REPORT Council's attention to
<br />REQUESTED a report in their packets
<br /> listing the job classifi-
<br />cations authorized to drive City vehicles home after hours. He
<br />stated that 46 City vehicles are involved, mostly used by Police,
<br />Building, and Public Works employees.
<br />
<br />Councilman Bricken moved to instruct the City Manager to prepare
<br />a report justifying the use of the City vehicles by the people
<br />who are authorized to drive them home after hours. The motion
<br />was seconded by Councilman Brandt, and carried unanimously 5:0.
<br /> CA 65B
<br />
<br />REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM The proposed Redevelopment
<br />BUDGET APPROVED AS PRESENTED Program Budget in the total
<br /> amount of $4,631,255.00
<br /> in the City's 1978-79
<br />preliminary budget was approved as presented by the Director,
<br />Richard Goblirsch, on the motion of Councilman Bricken, seconded
<br />by Vice Mayor Ward, and carried 4:1, with Councilman Yamamoto
<br />dissenting.
<br />
<br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
<br />
<br />270 JULY 1, 1978
<br />
<br />
<br />
|