Laserfiche WebLink
"AUTHORIZED RENrAL CHARGES FOR REFUSE CONTAINERS (DUMPSTERS) <br /> EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1978 <br /> <br /> Pickups New Monthly New Monthly <br />Size Per Week Old Rate No Castors With Castors <br /> <br />1 cubic yard 1 10.00 14.00 14.00 <br /> <br />cubic yard <br /> <br />1 17.00 20.50 23.00 <br />2 22.00 28.00 30.50 <br />3 27.00 35.50 38.00 <br />4 32.00 43.00 45.50 <br />5 37.00 S0.S0 53.00 <br />6 43.00 58.00 60.50 <br /> <br />3 cubic yard <br /> <br />1 23.00 26.50 29.00 <br />2 29.00 35.00 37.50 <br />3 35.00 43.50 46.00 <br />4 41.00 52.00 54.50 <br />5 47.00 60.50 63.00 <br />6 53.00 69.00 71.50 <br /> <br />4 cubic yard <br /> <br />1 28.00 32.50 35.00 <br />2 35.00 42.00 44.50 <br />3 42.00 51.50 54.00 <br />4 49.00 61.00 63.50 <br />5 56.00 70.50 73.00 <br />6 63.00 80.00 82.50 <br /> <br />NOTE: Additional charges are made for Roll Out and Back Out <br />Service." <br /> <br />Mary Cirkot, 214 South Lyon, said that the trash service was <br />not the best and that she had written a letter to the Mayor <br />asking for a refund of $4.76; she further stated that she did <br />not have a contract with Great Western and she requested that <br />the City, not the contractor, make the refund. <br /> <br />City Manager, Bruce Spragg, said that the city had received about <br />900 requests for rebate and that the contractor had agreed to <br />handle those requests; that the $4.76 Mrs. Cirkot referred to <br />includes a $2.00 charge for sanitation service; and that as of <br />July 30, 1978, the contractor had refunded $175.00 to residential <br />customers and man% times that figure to commercial customers. <br /> <br />Joe Gilmaker, 308 West Fourth Street, said that he favored reb5dding <br />the contract. <br /> <br />Bob Heath, businessman in Santa Ana, also spoke in support of <br />rebidding the trash contract and stated that other businessmen <br />would surely agree. <br /> <br />Councilman Bricken said that there had been little public response <br />during the many months of negotiation. Councilman Ortiz agreed <br />that very few comments had been received by Council. A-78-76 <br /> <br />CONSENT CALENDAR STAFF <br />RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVED <br /> <br />the recommendations of staff on the <br />Items: <br /> <br /> On the unanimously carried <br /> 6:0 motion of Councilman <br /> Garthe, seconded by Council- <br /> man Brandt, Council approved <br />following Consent Calendar <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />312 <br /> <br />JULY 25, 1978 <br /> <br /> <br />