Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Bricken asked the architects if these plans would be <br />reviewed by the Police Department for security evaluation. Mr. <br />Hench stated that they would be. He indicated that he had <br />personally met with the Police Department on the plans for the <br />Park-And-Ride, and intends to meet with them again when they get <br />into more detail. <br /> <br />Mr. Bricken asked what accommodations had been made for growth <br />in terms of: 1) possible alteration of the equipment itself¡ 2) <br />growth in useage¡ and 3) potential growth in tenants, such as <br />Trailways. Mr. Hench responded that in the begining of their <br />planning, they asked OCTD if longer buses would be used. OCTD <br />said no. Now, OCTD wants some space for layover purposes for <br />longer buses. Mr. Hench stated that the Terminal is designed <br />for 15 OCTD, and four Greyhound buses. He stated that there is <br />some concern that maybe this is to small. Mr. Hench further <br />stated that if Trailways would like to join the terminal, they <br />would have to negotiate for two of the bus bays from Greyhound <br />or OCTD. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Luxembourger asked if any provision had been made for <br />taxicab pick up points. Mr. Hench responded that there was <br />space along Fifth and also space on the drive-through for <br />taxicab pick up. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Mr. Luxembourg, seconded by Mr. Griset and <br />carried unanimously to approve the preliminary plans for the <br />OCTD Transit Terminal, subject to the questions raised being <br />addressed. <br /> <br />EXTENSION OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE FOR JAMES MOHLER <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Executive Director stated that one thing should be noted <br />with regards to the Mohler Development: When Mr. Mohler applied <br />for his original request to negotiate, he had an option to <br />acquire property from Mr. Curtis. The option fell through, and <br />staff is attempting to get both parties back together on the <br />matter so that Mr. Mohler still retains his designation as an <br />owner/participant. As of this moment in time, Staff doesn't <br />specifically know what is going on with regards to that <br />particular transaction between Mr. Curtis and Mr. Mohler. <br /> <br />Agency member Serrato inquired as to what would be the situation <br />if this purchase did not take place. The Executive Director <br />replied that from the Agency's point of view it wouldn't make <br />much difference -- Mohler would be a developer, not an <br />owner/participant. The Executive Director then referred the <br />question to the City Attorney. The City Attorney replied that <br />the matter would have to be reviewed if the purchase did not <br />take place. <br /> <br />Agency member Yamamoto stated that he had previously requested <br />staff to inform him of the date that Mr. Curtis purchased this <br />property, and that he would like this information before he <br />would consider voting on an extension of Mr. Mohler's right to <br />negotiate. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Mr. Serrato, seconded by Mr. Yamamoto and <br />carried unanimously, by the following roll call vote, to <br />continue this item to the next Agency meeting. <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />Bricken, Griset, <br />Markel (pursuant <br />None <br />None <br />Ward <br /> <br />Luxembourger, Serrato, Yamamoto, <br />to Section 6, Article 3) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAINED: <br /> <br />-4- <br />9 <br />