Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Establishment of Regular Meetins Schedule, Time, Location, <br />and Format <br /> <br />Following a very brief discussion, it was moved by Commissioner <br />Young, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, and carried unanimously <br />(5:0) that the Commission set the regular meetings of the <br />Downtown Development Commission for the fourth Tuesday of <br />each month at 7:00 p.m., at a Downtown location to be determined <br />later, using the basic meeting and agenda f#rmat currently <br />used by the Redevelopment Agency. <br /> <br />Establishment of an Advisory Board to the Downtown Development <br />Commission <br /> <br />Chairman Luxembourger recommended further consideration of <br />this item prior to acting upon it. The Chairman then requested <br />clarification of the boundaries of the area for which a <br />representative board was being requested. Mr. Kooi exhibited <br />a large map with the proposed Downtown Jurisdictional Boundaries <br />indicated, and referred the commissioners to the background <br />material and exhibits in their agenda packets, which were <br />submitted in conjunction with the request for adoption of <br />the proposed Downtown Jurisdictional Boundaries. Commissioner <br />Griset asked Mr. Kooi how and why the figure "nine" had been <br />determined to be the recommended number of board members, <br />and Mr. Kooi explained that seven members often results in <br />three or four individuals being present at meetings. with <br />the minimum number of attending members at six, Mr. Kooi <br />estimated that nine board members needed to be appointed. <br />Mr. Kooi further explained that many cities have backlogs of <br />citizens wishing to serve their city in some capacity. If <br />that is not the case, he suggested that the Commission may <br />want to consider advertising to solicit interested constituents. <br />Commissioner Bricken suggested that the item consists of two <br />issues: one of determining an appropriate mixture of representation <br />and one of selecting the individuals to be appointed. Commissioner <br />Young suggested that the board be established, with discussion <br />of the categories to be represented occurring at a later <br />time. Commissioner Stanton pointed out the desirability of <br />an appointee who includes the quality of an orientation to <br />the historical aspects of Downtown Santa Ana. Commissioner <br />Griset moved to continue the item, Commissioner Bricken <br />seconded the motion, and the Commission unanimously (5:0) <br />continued the consideration regarding the establishment of <br />an Advisory Board to the Downtown Development Commission. <br /> <br />Adoption of proposed Downtown Jurisdictional Boundaries <br /> <br />Recalling that this topic has been addressed by Mr. Kooi in <br />the course of discussing the preceding item, it was moved by <br />Commissioner Young, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, and <br /> <br />7 <br />