My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/21/1985
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
SUCCESOR AGENCY(formerly Community Redevelopment Agency)
>
COMMUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
1973-1999
>
1985
>
05/21/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:15:04 PM
Creation date
3/3/2005 11:40:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/21/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />upon the request from the Chairman, the secretary presented him <br />with the following written requests to address the Agency: <br /> <br />Steve Valencia (Steve's Barber Shop) <br />311 W. 4th street <br />Santa Ana, CA. <br /> <br />The Freeman Family <br />206 W. 18th Street <br />Santa Ana, CA. 92706 <br /> <br />C. Robert Ferguson <br />Attorney for Ms. Velma L. Freeman <br />301 E. Colorado Blvd. <br />Pasadena, CA. 91101 <br /> <br />The Chairman then stated that the Agency would like to hear from <br />those people who desired to address the Agency on the issue. He <br />added that, if someone desired to address the Agency, they were to <br />step forward to the podium and give their name and address and to <br />limit their comments to five minutes and identify to which property <br />their comments pertained. He stated further: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Please keep in mind the requirements of Section 1245.235 of <br />the Code of Civil procedure that your comments should only <br />address the following four issues: <br /> <br />Whether the public interest and necessity require the project: <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that <br />will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the <br />least private injury: <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Whether the properties sought to be acquired are necessary for <br />the project: or <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Whether an offer, as required by Section 7267.2 <br />Government Code, has been made to the record owner. <br /> <br />of the <br /> <br />Chairman Griset then asked if there were those who wished to speak <br />in opposition to the proposed action. <br /> <br />Ms. Kathy Les of Heritage orange County addressed the Agency and <br />stated that Heritage Orange County opposed any further demolition <br />in the Downtown Historic Area. She added that they understood the <br />importance of the proposed development but that their position was <br />still to oppose further demolition of historical properties. <br /> <br />Chairman Griset then declared the Public Hearing closed and asked <br />if Agency Members had further questions of staff. <br /> <br />4. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.