Laserfiche WebLink
<br />structurally substandard buildings, elimination of blighting <br />influences, provision of substantial offstreet parking through the use <br />of multi-story parking structures, removal of impediments of land <br />disposition and development, and achievement of changes in land use." <br />The Real Estate Manager said that, in his opinion, the Fiesta <br />tlÞMarketplace development, which necessitated the proposed condemnation, <br />was an implementation of this stated Agency objective. The Real Estate <br />Manager then advised that he wished to incorporate by reference the <br />Staff Report, dated October 21, 1986, which was contained in the agenda <br />packet provided to the Agency Members for this Public Hearing. He <br />added that the owners of the subject properties were extended an <br />invitation to participate in the Fiesta Marketplace project, but <br />declined and that the Agency had offered fair market value as <br />established by an independent appraiser to purchase each of the subject <br />properties and that each owner had declined such offer to purchase. <br /> <br />The Agency Secretary affirmed <br />written communications. <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />Chairman <br /> <br />that <br /> <br />there <br /> <br />were no <br /> <br />The Chairman then stated that the Agency would like to hear from those <br />people who desired to address the Agency on this issue and asked them <br />to keep in mind the requirements of Section 1245.235 of the Code of <br />Civil Procedure that all comments should only address the following <br />four issues: <br /> <br />1) Whether the public interest and necessity require the project; 2) <br />tlÞwhether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be <br />most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private <br />injury; 3) whether the property sought to be acquired is necessary for <br />the project; or, 4) whether an offer, as required by Section 7267.2 of <br />the Government Code, has been made to the record owner. <br /> <br />There being no one who wished to address the Agency the Chairman <br />declared the Public Hearing closed and called for a motion. <br /> <br />It was moved by Agency Member McGuigan, seconded by Chairman Griset and <br />carried unanimously (5:0) that the Agency adopt Resolution No. 86-54: <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA <br />ANA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY <br />FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE A-8 DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF <br />SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY <br />THEREFOR (202-210 EAST FOURTH STREET AND 313 NORTH BUSH STREET). <br /> <br />JOINT PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING <br />WITH KIRK S. EVANS, INC. <br /> <br />Chairman Griset opened the Public Hearing and, after it had proceeded <br />~through the staff presentation, Agency Member Acosta stated that he did <br />~not feel 'that he could support the adoption of Resolution No. 86-59 <br />because Mr. Kirk Evans had not presented an audited financial statement <br />with his proposal as required by the Request for Proposal. After a <br />discussion period between staff and the Agency Members, it was <br />determined that the proper procedure would be to defer the Public <br />Hearing until such time as Agency Member Young arrived. <br /> <br />DISPOSITION <br /> <br />AND <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />AGREEMENT <br /> <br />3 <br />