My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/18/1986
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
SUCCESOR AGENCY(formerly Community Redevelopment Agency)
>
COMMUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
1973-1999
>
1986
>
11/18/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:15:01 PM
Creation date
3/3/2005 11:45:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
11/18/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />After Agency Member Young's arrival at 6:45 P.M., the Chairman declared <br />the Joint Public Hearing of the Community Redevelopment Agency and the <br />City Council of the City of Santa Ana for the proposed sale of property <br />known as the La Bonita site by the Community Redevelopment Agency of <br />tlÞthe City of Santa Ana to Kirk S. Evans, Inc., adding that the site is <br />4.81 acres of land located at 1421 La Bonita Street, just south of <br />Westminster Avenue. He then asked staff to identify the property or <br />issues and give the Commission's recommendation as well as the staff's <br />comments. <br /> <br />Project Manager Patti Nunn stated that Kirk S. Evans, Inc. was awarded <br />an Exclusive Right to Negotiate for the La Bonita site on August 19, <br />1986 and that a Disposition and Development Agreement had been <br />negotiated for the development of the 4.81 acre site located south of <br />Westminster Avenue between Euclid and Newhope Streets. She pointed out <br />that the La Bonita site was originally purchased from the Garden Grove <br />Unified School District by the City to be used as a park but that, <br />after passage of Proposition 13, funds were not available to develop <br />the site and the decision was made to sell the land to the Agency for <br />the appraised value, with the understanding that the Agency would <br />market the site for housing development and that the proceeds of the <br />sale would go toward the improvement of Rosita Park. She stated staff <br />had worked diligently with Mr. Evans to finalize the proposal now <br />being submitted for approval, adding that this proposal called for the <br />development of 48 single-family detached homes on individual lots <br />averaging 3,000 square feet, that the development is situated on a <br />tlÞprivate street with a loop configuration that measures 36 feet wide <br />except at the southerly tip where it measures 32 feet wide, and that <br />all the units are two stories and feature three bedrooms. She stated <br />that the purchase price of the land to be paid by the developer is <br />$18,000 a unit for a total of $864,000 and that construction on the <br />project will begin within 90 days of conveyance of the site which is <br />expected to occur in January, 1987. She pointed out that the developer <br />has secured financing from Charter Savings Bank, who has provided an <br />Offering Letter, dated July 21, 1986, confirming a loan commitment <br />through 12:00 noon December 31, 1986. The Project Manager stated that <br />Mr. Evan's proposal was presented to the Community Redevelopment <br />Commission at their Meeting of November 4, 1986 and that the Commission <br />recommended that the Redevelopment Agency: 1) Approve a Disposition and <br />Development Agreement with Kirk S. Evans, Inc. for the La Bonita site <br />and authorize the Chairman to execute the necessary documents; and 2) <br />approve the conceptual development plans proposed by Kirk S. Evans, <br />Inc. for the site. She then introduced Mr. Kirk Evans for further <br />comment on his proposed development. <br /> <br />The Chairman and Members of the Agency agreed that they did not feel it <br />was necessary for them to look at a slide presentation which Mr. Evans <br />~ad available in Council Chambers. Mr. Evans stated that he wished to <br />thank the Agency staff who had given him great support and enabled him <br />to bring back a proposal which is, in his opinion, superior to the one <br />first presented to the Agency. He pointed out that the square footage <br />of the project had been increased by eliminating the two-bedroom model <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.