Laserfiche WebLink
The Principal Planner presented the staff report and recommendations. <br /> <br />The Clerk of the Council reported there were no written communications. <br /> <br />The following people spoke in favor of the relocation of the shelter to <br />120 S. Daisy Street. <br /> <br />Thomas Whaling, 23010 Lake Forest Drive, Laguna Hills <br />Robert Martin, 1415 S. Broadway <br />Lynn Tavernetti, 1314 N. Spurgeon <br />Zika Djokovich, 211N. Main <br />Smiley Calderon, 931N. Main <br />Don Harris, 623 Knowell Street, Costa Mesa <br />Bob Savage, 1608B N. Main <br />Lorin Griset, 2221N. Linwood <br />Reverend Lewis Whitehead, 1422 W. Raymar <br />Bruce LeDoux, 1011S. Orange <br />Shelley Watkins, 515 S. Birch <br /> <br />Robert Martin also presented a petition, containing 419 signatures, in favor <br />of the relocation of the shelter to 120 S. Daisy Street. <br /> <br />The following people spoke against the relocation of the shelter to 120 <br />So Daisy Street. <br /> <br />Columbus Hamilton, 614 S. Wood <br />Ruby Gonzales, 1901W. Second <br />Tamara Mohr, 2313 West Brook <br />James Burto, 538 S. Daisy <br />Gildardo Melgoza, 116 S. Franklin <br />A1 Gardner, 3602 Hazard <br />Cecilia Barajas, 119 S. Daisy <br />Elaine Moore, 2314 W. Highland <br />Albert Gipson, 505 S. Townsend <br />Sam Romero, 2034 S. Spruce <br />Jim Tucker, 2062 S. Rene <br />Arlene Roberts, resident of Tustin <br />Albert Holmon, 517 S. Shelley <br />Marcelus Lang, 1631W. Santa Ana Blvd. <br />Hal Gosse, 1420 E. Nineteenth St. <br /> <br />Cecilia Barajas also presented a petition, containing 1200 signatures, <br />against the relocation of the shelter to 120 S. Daisy Street. <br /> <br />There were no other speakers on the matter. The Mayor closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />The Council recessed from 10:26 p.m. to 10:36 p.m. <br /> <br />Following discussion, MOTION made by Griset, seconded by Serrato, to <br />receive and file the Negative Declarations and instruct the City Attorney <br />to prepare resolutions denying Appeal No. 427, denying VA 80-58; and denying <br />Appeal No. 428, denying CUP 80-19, affirming the decision of the Planning <br />Commission, FAILED on the following vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Griset, Markel, Serrato <br />Bricken, Luxembourger, Ward, Yamamoto <br />None <br /> <br />MOTION was made by Luxembourger, seconded by Yamamoto, to receive and <br />file the Negative Declarations and instruct the City Attorney to prepare <br />resolutions granting Appeal No. 427, approving VA 80-58; and granting Appeal <br />No. 428, approving CUP 80-19, overruling the decision of the Planning Commis- <br />sion. <br /> <br />Motion passed on the following vote: <br /> <br />AYES: Bricken, Luxembourger, Ward, Yamamoto <br />NOES: Griset, Markel, Serrato CA 13.3 <br />ABSENT: None CA 13.4 <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 428 DECEMBER 15, 1980 <br /> <br /> <br />