|
Additional comments and information were given by the City Manager, the
<br />Chief of Planning and Zoning, and Assistant City Manager Swanson.
<br />
<br />Following further discussion, MOTION was made by Griset, seconded by Markel,
<br />to approve and file the Negative Declaration, and instruct the City Attorney
<br />to prepare a resolution denying Appeal No. 450, denying CUP 81-8, and affirm-
<br />ing the decision of the Planning Commission.
<br />
<br />Vote was taken as follows:
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />ABSENT:
<br />
<br />Bricken, Griset, Markel, McGuigan,
<br />Acosta, Luxembourger, Serrato
<br />None
<br />
<br />Councilmember McGuigan stated she had voted incorrectly and requested a
<br />revote. Motion FAILED on the following vote:
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />ABSENT:
<br />
<br />Bricken, Griset, Markel
<br />Acosta, Luxembourger, McGuigan, Serrato
<br />None
<br />
<br />MOTION was made by Acosta, seconded by Luxembourger, to approve and file
<br />the Negative Declaration, and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a
<br />resolution granting Appeal No. 450, approving CUP 81-8, and overruling
<br />the decision of the Planning Commission, with exceptions to the Findings
<br />of Fact as follows: delete the requirement of 50 feet of frontage on all
<br />homesites; delete the requirement that minimum homesite area be 6,000
<br />square feet; delete setback requirements; delete the requirement of perm-
<br />anent foundations, and allow either garages or carports.
<br />
<br />Motion passed on the following vote:
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />ABSENT:
<br />
<br />Acosta, Luxembourger, McGuigan, Serrato
<br />Bricken, Griset, Markel
<br />None
<br />
<br />CA 13.4
<br />
<br />MOTION was made by Acosta, seconded by Luxembourger, to consolidate
<br />testimony given on Appeal Application No. 450 and Appeal Application
<br />No. 451, and to approve and file the Negative Declaration, and instruct
<br />the City Attorney to prepare a resolution granting Appeal No. 451, approv-
<br />ing VA 81-12, and overruling the decision of the Planning Commission.
<br />
<br />Motion passed on the following vote:
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />ABSENT:
<br />
<br />Acosta, Luxembourger, McGuigan, Serrato
<br />Bricken, Griset, Markel
<br />None
<br />
<br />CA 13.3
<br />
<br />Council recessed at 11:45 p.m., and reconvened at 11:53 p.m., with all
<br />members present.
<br />
<br />PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT The Mayor announced that this
<br />APPLICATION #858 - FRENCH PARK was the time and place for the
<br />HISTORIC DISTRICT public hearing of Amendment
<br />CONTINUED TO 9/21/81 Application No. 858, filed by
<br /> the City of Santa Ana to rezone
<br />property known as the the French Park Historic District from the P and
<br />R3H Districts to the P-SD and R3H-SD Districts, and approve Interim
<br />Development Guidelines for said districts.
<br />
<br />The Chief of Planning and Zoning presented the staff report and recommenda-
<br />tions, and gave a slide presentation regarding the area in question.
<br />
<br />The Assistant Clerk of the Council reported a written communication from
<br />Douglas and Linda Neefe in favor of the amendment application.
<br />
<br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
<br />
<br />283
<br />
<br />SEPTEMBER 8, 1981
<br />
<br />!1 I
<br />
<br />
<br />
|