My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
URS CORPORATION 4 - 2005
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
U
>
URS CORPORATION 4 - 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:54:52 PM
Creation date
3/30/2005 4:20:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
URS Corporation
Contract #
A-2005-046
Agency
Police
Council Approval Date
3/7/2005
Expiration Date
12/31/2005
Insurance Exp Date
5/1/2008
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Orange County Sheriff's Office. Orlando. FL; Florida Regional Domestic Security Taskforce Risk <br />Assessment Model: ASIS International: and other open source documents. This model is becoming <br />commonly used for target vulnerability assessment. <br /> <br />Finally, if extensive and very specific vulnerability information is desired for each target. URS will develop <br />a cost estimate to include an analysis using the RiskWatch@ model. RiskWatch@ was developed as a <br />software tool based on the extensive site-specific vulnerability assessment guidance in FEMA Reference <br />Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings (FEMA 426, December 2003). As shown <br />in the brochure (included at the end of this section), RiskWatch@ includes over 350 questions for each <br />facility that would require data input. RiskWatch@ also allows the analysis of cost-benefit of preventative <br />measures and can estimate a return-on-investment (ROI) for security improvement options. It normally <br />takes between three and four weeks to compile the information to input into RiskWatch@for each facility <br />and we would typically use this model in conducting vulnerability assessments for facility owners and not <br />for area-wide planning analyses. However, if this level of information is desired for the top targets <br />identified in this project. we would be pleased to provide the cost and schedule to conduct this detailed <br />analysis. <br /> <br />URS will develop a draft report section for review and comment and we will finalize this section <br />incorporating comments received. <br /> <br />Legal Hazard Sites (Part 3 of the Risk Assessment) <br />URS will compile data for legal hazardous sites from HM and FS in each UA. In our experience, <br />information from these agencies is generally current and very accurate. The information will be compiled <br />for each UA and broken down by the CBRNE categories. <br /> <br />When consensus is reached for the vulnerability assessment, URS will develop a draft report section for <br />review and comment and we will finalize this section incorporating comments received. <br /> <br />CAPABILITIES ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />URS will conduct an accurate assessment of the current and desired capabilities of the Orange County <br />Operational Area (OCOA) to prevent. respond to and recover from a terrorism event. Following the <br />complete assessment of capabilities we will develop recommendations for strategic improvement of the <br />Operational Area's. The model created by URS to collect and analyze data follows the specifications <br />described in the RFP and complies with the guidelines of the US Department of Homeland Security. <br />Office for Domestic Preparedness' State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program, Urban <br />Area Jurisdiction Handbook. <br /> <br />Data Model <br />The model will be used to assess the emergency response capabilities. as well as the planning. <br />organization, equipment. training and exercise capabilities of each Urban Area. URS will 1 ) validate <br />existing and collect missing information: 2) project needed response capabilities: 3) analyze current and <br />desired response capabilities to identify gaps: and 4) make recommendations for cost effective <br />capabilities improvement to the OCOA. The following sections provide the methodology for data <br />collection. <br /> <br />Page 11 of 51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.