Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Training <br />URS will collect/validate information on personnel and current and needed levels of training according to <br />the data model identified above. The required level of training for each discipline will be based on <br />consensus with the UA and on URS subject matter expert suggestions. URS will also assess local <br />emergency response training location and local course capabilities and make recommendations for <br />improvement. Emphasis will be placed on training level analysis including awareness. performance <br />(defensive and offensive), and planning/management training. <br /> <br />Exercises <br />Exercising of equipment and training prior to a real incident is vital to a successful WMD emergency <br />response. We will survey the jurisdictions. special districts. agencies and organizations to determine what <br />exercises are currently planned for the OCOA. We will draw on the expertise our EG&G Technical <br />Services, Inc subsidiary., which holds the Western Region ODP Homeland Security Exercise and <br />Evaluation Program Technical Assistance Contract, to develop recommendations for a coordinated <br />exercise program. The exercise program will be targeted to address the most vital needs identified in the <br />risk assessment and to ensure that new training and equipment are accompanied by the opportunity for <br />first responders to use the equipment prior to a WMD incident. <br /> <br />URS understands that the UASI strategy is a dynamic process and will quickly evolve. This is especially <br />true as WMD capabilities in the UA's significantly improve during the first year or two of grant funding. <br />Considering this dynamic, URS will provide the UA's with the Microsoft ACCESS database developed for <br />this project protected upon completion of the scope of work. allowing the Urban Areas to update the data <br />on an on-going basis. <br /> <br />SPENDING STRATEGY <br /> <br />It has been apparent to UA's that have completed the UASI capabilities assessment that the cost to fill all <br />of the needs identified far exceeds any reasonable assumptions about funding that may be available. <br />Consequently. it is necessary for each UA to develop a methodology to prioritize spending to fill the most <br />important needs. URS will use a combination of statistical analysis and consensus building to develop the <br />priorities and spending strategy to be included in the Countywide Strategic Plan for Terrorism <br />Preparedness. This combination will provide a technically supported. reproducible list of spending <br />priorities. We propose establishing priorities at four levels: very high, high. medium and low. This will <br />result in numerous items at each level and will provide the UAs with some flexibility and discretion to <br />select desired items in the higher categories as needs arise. <br /> <br />Based on results of the capabilities assessment. the UASI needs prioritization model will be adjusted to <br />include strengthening regional preparedness and capabilities in the mutual aid regions of the OCOA. <br /> <br />As part of the needs prioritization modeling process. URS will develop a shopping list of various <br />prevention/response elements (e.g. collect PTE intelligence, prevent terrorist from accessing sites, detect <br />WMD's. rescue victims from site after attack. etc.) and a meeting will be organized with select agencies <br />members to rank and weight these prevention/response elements based on group consensus regarding <br />relative importance. Based on information provided during the pre-bid meeting. it is expected that <br /> <br />Page 14 of 51 <br />