Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~Wt. <br />-~~ <br />~ <br /> <br />COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN <br />FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS <br /> <br />currently planned for the OCOA. We will draw on the expertise our EC&C Technical Services. Inc subsidiary" <br />which holds the Western Region ODP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program Technical <br />Assistance Contract. to develop recommendations for a coordinated exercise program. The exercise program <br />will be targeted to address the most vital needs identified in the risk assessment and to ensure that new training <br />and equipment are accompanied by the opportunity for first responders to use the equipment prior to a WMD <br />incident. <br /> <br />URS understands that the UASI strategy is a dynamic process and will quickly evolve. This is especially true as <br />WMD capabilities in the UAs significantly improve during the first year or two of grant funding. Considering this <br />dynamic, URS will provide the UAs with the Microsoft ACCESS database developed for this project protected <br />upon completion of the scope of work. allowing the Urban Areas to update the data on an on-going basis. <br /> <br />Spending Strateg' <br />It has been apparent to UAs that have completed the UASI capabilities assessment that the cost to fill all of the <br />needs identified far exceeds any reasonable assumptions about funding that may be available. Consequently. it <br />is necessary for each UA to develop a methodology to prioritize spending to fill the most important needs. URS <br />will use a combination of statistical analysis and consensus building to develop the priorities and spending <br />strategy to be included in the Countywide Strategic Plan for Terrorism Preparedness. This combination will <br />provide a technically supported, reproducible list of spending priorities. We propose establishing priorities at <br />four levels: very high, high, medium and low. This will result in numerous items at each level and will provide <br />the UAs with some flexibility and discretion to select desired items in the higher categories as needs arise. <br /> <br />Based on results of the capabilities assessment we will customize the UASI needs prioritization model <br />developed for the San Diego UASI project to meet the needs of the OCOA. Specifically, the model will be <br />adjusted to emphasize strengthening regional preparedness and capabilities in the mutual aid regions of the <br />OCOA. <br /> <br />As part of the needs prioritization modeling process, URS will develop a shopping list of various <br />prevention/response elements (e.g. collect PTE intelligence, prevent terrorist from accessing sites, detect <br />WMDs, rescue victims from site after attack. etc.) and a meeting will be organized with select agencies <br />members to rank and weight these prevention-re_"polhP P/Pf7IPfl!S based on group consensus regarding relative <br />importance. Based on information provided during the pre-bid meeting. it is expected that preventions <br />elements may be weighted higher than some response elements. The Delphi method of assessing group <br />consensus will be used. This method involves a discussion of assessment objectives, anonymous voting by each <br />participant regarding the relative importance of the different prevention/response elements, statistical feedback <br />on the distribution of individual responses. an open discussion of the significant differences of opinion, and <br />conducting additional rounds of assessment as necessary. <br /> <br />The raw gap for each item listed in the capability assessment under planning, organization, equipment, training, <br />and exercises will be calculated as the difference between the target and current levels of the resource. The gap <br />will be expressed as a percentage of the desired level. For example. if the capability assessment indicates that 4 <br />urban search and rescue (US&R) vehicles are needed and only 1 is present, the gap would be 75%. The impact <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br />