My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 100 W. MACARTHUR BLVD.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
06/06/2005
>
31A - 100 W. MACARTHUR BLVD.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:55:13 PM
Creation date
5/31/2005 5:11:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
6/6/2005
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The proposed project has included architectural <br />modifications, signage and landscape treatments to <br />compliment the existing aesthetic environment. Through the <br />City's site plan review process the design of the proposed <br />project was determined to be in compliance with the intent <br />of the district design element. Implementation of the <br />proposed project would not degrade the existing visual <br />character of the Sandpointe District setting. <br /> <br />Paths <br /> <br />Paths are means by which people travel throughout the City <br />and serve as the framework for the City's urban form. <br />Within the project area, the Urban Design Element <br />identifies Main Street and MacArthur Boulevard as Paths. <br />The proposed project would be consistent with the Path <br />design element in that landscape planters would be provided <br />along Main Street and MacArthur Boulevard to enhance the <br />streetscape. <br /> <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, <br />which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in <br />the area? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The project site is currently improved with existing on- <br />street lighting. Implementation of the proposed project <br />would not introduce substantial new sources of light and <br />glare into the project area. <br /> <br />II. AGRICULTURE <br /> <br />A. Convert Prime Far.mland, Unique Far.mland or Far.mland of <br />Statewide Importance to non-agriculture use? <br />B. Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use or a <br />Williamson Contract? <br />C. Involve other changes in the existing environment, <br />which, due to their location or nature, could <br />individually or cumulatively result in loss of <br />Far.mland, to non-agriculture use? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the California Department of Conservation <br />Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, the project site <br />does not contain Unique Farmlands, Prime Farmlands or <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />31A8~5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.