Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Explore revenue ralsmg opportunities including the institution of a Community Facilities <br />District to create a funding source for infrastructure improvements and operations enhancements <br />necessary to support new large development projects; <br /> <br />· Finalize the residential development standards on both a city-wide and historic neighborhood <br />basis; <br /> <br />· Conduct planning studies for Santa Ana Boulevard and the East First and Fourth Street <br />Corridor; <br /> <br />· Reinforce the City's internal systems by improving data systems with funding for the City's <br />strategic technology plan; <br /> <br />. Continue the implementation of our Total Quality Service philosophy; <br /> <br />· Provide a leadership role in enhancing the region's domestic preparedness by implementing the <br />second year of the Urban Area Security Initiative grant awarded to Santa Ana as the Core City <br />to ensure that all fIrst responders have adequate equipment and systems to prevent, respond to <br />and recover from, acts of terrorism, <br /> <br />· Facilitate the relocation and construction of the Fourth District Court of Appeal Facility in the <br />Civic Center by fInancing, designing, and constructing a 300 space three-level parking structure <br />in the City Hall Super Block Parking Lot, and <br /> <br />· Partner with the Orange County Transportation Authority in its efforts to extend the expiration <br />of Measure M, the half-cent local sales tax dedicated to funding street and transit improvement <br />projects. <br /> <br />Financial Overview <br /> <br />The City continues to address the challenge of meeting demands that exceed resources in a financial <br />environment that has been dominated by the actions of the State in two major areas: increasing <br />retirement costs and diverting local government revenues. Over the past two years the City has been <br />required to absorb previously unanticipated signifIcant increases in costs due to the poor <br />management of investments by the state-run retirement system. The direct impact of these <br />investment losses by the State was an increase in expenditures in the General Fund of $11.8 million <br />in 2004-2005 and an additional $4.1 million for the 2005-2006 fIscal year. As a comparison, the <br />actuarial prepared by the State in 2001 stated that the projection of surpluses in the City's accounts <br />would support the retirement system without requiring a contribution to the fund for 67 years for the <br />general employees and 32 years for our safety employees. To ameliorate a portion of the impact of <br />this action by the State, the City has requested a recalculation of the rate based on changes in the <br />term of the payments to the system, which has resulted in a reduction of $1 million for the coming <br />year. <br /> <br />Further, the State's approach to addressing its own fiscal crisis continues to diminish the City's <br />resources through reductions in revenues and increases in expenditures. In an effort to resolve a <br />projected $17 billion structural budget defIcit in 2004-2005, the State again targeted City revenues as <br />a part of the solution to its problem. In response, the councils and staffs of cities throughout the State <br />worked together with the League of California Cities to take the actions necessary to place a measure <br />on the November ballot that would protect local government revenues from being diverted by the <br /> <br />Resolution No. eRA 2005-003 <br />Page 10 of 22 <br /> <br />3 <br />