My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-099 - Overriding Considerations for the Alton Avenue Overcrossing at the SR-55 Freeway Project
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
2005-099 - Overriding Considerations for the Alton Avenue Overcrossing at the SR-55 Freeway Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2015 12:08:46 PM
Creation date
10/26/2005 11:52:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2005-099
Date
10/17/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Draft Findings of Fact and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (applies to CEQA only) <br /> <br />the No Build Alternative and under the Preferred Alternative. For Site 3, the existing noise level <br />is 62 dBA, and the predicted noise level for year 2025 is 67 dBA under the No Build Alternative <br />and under the Preferred Alternative. <br /> <br />Site I (Carriage Stop Motel) would not be substantially impacted. For Site 1, the existing noise <br />level is 59 dBA, and the predicted noise levels for year 2025 are 62 dBA under the No Build <br />Alternative and 62 dBA under the Preferred Alternative. <br /> <br />Where future noise levels exceed the applicable NAC, noise abatement must be considered for <br />reasonableness and feasibility, based on 23 CFR 772 and the Caltrans/FHW A Protocol. <br />According to this Protocol, the noise abatement must achieve a minimum of five dB of noise <br />reduction at the impacted receptor in order to be considered feasible. Other factors may also <br />affect feasibility, including topography, access requirements (driveways, ramps, etc.), local cross <br />streets, other noise sources, and safety considerations. <br /> <br />Noise abatement, in the form of a property line noise barrier, was evaluated for Site 2, the <br />Adagio Apartments and for Site 3, the single-family residence located at 110 Aiton Avenue. A <br />noise barrier is not considered reasonable at Site 2 because it would block both vehicle and <br />pedestrian access to this property from Main Street. A property line noise barrier at Site 3 would <br />be feasible because it would provide at least a five-dB noise reduction. <br /> <br />Noise abatement, in the form of a property line noise barrier, was evaluated for Site 2, the <br />Adagio Apartments and for Site 3, the single-family residence located at 110 Aiton Avenue. A <br />noise barrier is not considered reasonable at Site 2 because it would block both vehicle and <br />pedestrian access to this property from Main Street. A property line noise barrier at Site 3 would <br />be feasible because it would provide at least a five-dB noise reduction. The recommended noise <br />abatement for Site 3 is a noise barrier wall that would be located at the property line, and will be <br />2.4 m (8 ft) high and 22.8 m (75 ft) long. <br /> <br />Temporary Impacts (Construction) <br /> <br />. During the construction phases of the Alton Avenue Overcrossing project, noise from <br />construction activities may intermittently dominate the noise environment in the immediate <br />area of construction. Demolition and grading, which require removal of existing structures, <br />would result in the highest noise levels. Construction noise is regulated by Caltrans' <br />Standard Specifications Section 7-1.011, "Sound Control Requirements." These <br />requirements state that noise levels generated during construction shall comply with <br />applicable local, state, and federal regulations and that all equipment shall be fitted with <br />adequate mufflers according to the manufacturers' specifications. Because construction <br />activity would be conducted in accordance with Caltrans' standard specifications (and by <br />extension with local state and federal regulations), and because the noise would be short- <br />term, intermittent, and dominated by local traffic noise, no adverse noise impacts from <br />construction are anticipated. <br /> <br />Mitigation: The City shall implement the following mitigation measures: <br /> <br />NOl-I <br /> <br />All equipment shall have sound-control devices no less effective than those provided <br />on the original equipment. No cquipment shall have an unmuffled exhaust. <br /> <br />NOl-2 <br /> <br />As directed by Caltrans or the Cities of Santa Ana and Irvine, the contractor shall <br />implement appropriate additional noise mitigation measures, including, but not <br /> <br />ResojIllWA.wo..2tlQ~ng at SR-55 <br />Page 32 of 49 <br /> <br />K-20 <br /> <br />April July 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.