Laserfiche WebLink
<br />09/22/2005 15:23 <br /> <br />7l~-557-83~~ <br /> <br />COMM. & ADU. PLNG. <br /> <br />PAGE 02/0~ <br /> <br />ArrAdHMENT1 <br /> <br />In response to your request for input on the subject .project. Environmental Resources <br />has reviewed the document. It Is reCXlmmended that the following issues be addressed <br />in the DElR: <br />,. <br />1) The water quality impacts of tho project should be evaluated in accordance with the <br />provisions ouUlned in Exhibit 7-1 of the 2003 Countywide Drainage Area <br />Managomerrt Plan (DAMP). At a minimum, the following information should be <br />provided: . . . . V 1:: ~ <br /> <br />a) A. desaiplion of project charactoristics with respect to water quality issues. such <br />as project Site. ioc3tl6ii'jnagrven watershed, site acreagJ!. dJ8ngeJn"ilI3~ · . <br />im~'surfac9 ~rea, and BMPsto be incorporated into the. projectoesigo_ .. <br />b) A ravlew ofDAMP Exhiblt7.1 Table 7-1.1, Priority Projects Categories. Projects <br />thai fall inlo one of these calegories should be carefully I'llviewed for potenlial 1) 1- 13 <br />r _ . stormwaterlurtlan runoff impacts. <br />0) Identification of receiving watenl. The EIR should identify alliecerving w.JferS"-n -.L- - . <br />that may receive runoff from the project site. ,v - C- <br />d) A desaiption of thell9llSilivity of the receiving watern_ In particular theEIR <br />should Identify Areas of Special Biological Significance, water bodies with T otalt' t1 - D <br />Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), 303(d) listed impaired water bodies. !.I J<.,::' <br /> <br />e) A characterization of the potential water quality Impacts from the proposoo <br />project and identification of the anticipated pollutants to be generated by the I' 1 _ ~ <br />project. .Y ..+: V <br /> <br />f) An identification of hydrologic conditions of concern, such as runoff volume anO <br />velocjty; reduced infiltration, and inc:mased flow, frequency, duration, and peak.fl( 1- .c <br />stonn runoff. . \ j) f <br /> <br />g) An assessment of project impad significance 10 watar quality. ]) ::k- C:> <br />h) An evaluation of thresholds of Significance. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />])~lt <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />7 SCr42 <br />