ELIZABETH MOULE & STEFANOS POLYZOIDES 1

Home Browse Search

SANTA ANA RENAISSANCE SPECIFIC PLAN PROPOSAL B •. PLAN TASKS Task 1: Project Initiation, Fieldwork, Interviews, Analysis Weeks 1-6: Ian 3 to Feb io We propose the following scope of work to accomplish the needs identified by the City in the RFP. For the purposes of this proposal, we assume the schedule begin- ning January 3, 2005 per the RFP. We propose to accomplish the schedule by using the charrette process. We conduct the vast majority of our planning projects in this manner and receive consistent high marks from everyone involved. We are experts at this process in that we understand what needs to be invested in the beginning, during and the end of the process to realize effective and desired change. We understand the long-term substantial bene- fit of early, relationship -building with the community and stakeholders. Not only do we achieve Inspired results In less time, but we use people's time more effectively and create genuine momentum often absent or diminished through longer process- es. Through the charrette, the consultant team gets maximum results out of each team member by working more intensely and collaboratively than in typical planning efforts: you have our collective, undivided attention on the project with synergy and maximum creativity. Very few teams can effectively work in this manner due to the numerous intricacies and needs of the process and project. We are one of those few who have proven over time to work successfully in this way. Last, while we clearly pre- fer and propose the charrette process, we are prepared to discuss modifications with you if you so desire. However, the budget would require adjustment. Purpose: To familiarize the team, staff and the decision -makers with all of the rele- vant information, requirements and range of preliminary Ideas about the site for early direction and preparation for the Charrette. Kickoff Meeting Week 1: We will facilitate the initial meeting with City staff and any other parties the city invites, to review the project scope, finalize the work program/schedule and con- firm key project issues and goals. For efficiency purposes, we propose to include this meeting as the initial portion of our on-site 'Pre-Charrette' work. Pre-Charrette Work Weeks 1-3: Here, we focus on gaining the necessary information with which to pre- pare a series of 'x-ray' diagrams of the project area for a variety of subjects ranging from historic resources, open space, traffic and transit, parking, walkability, econom- ics and development patterns. We will tour the project area with City staff and con- duct interviews with the appropriate staff and interested parties to gain additional insight and direction. Week 4: We will meet with City staff to present the work to date on analysis and inter- views to prepare for Joint Study Session I. We propose joint study sessions to accom- plish the 10 month schedule and to maximize interaction between all intersted par- ties. Week 6: We will present the following to the Planning Commission in a study ses- sion: a) findings and recommendations about the sites, b) principles of Traditional Neighborhood Development as they apply to the project sites, c) 3 Scale and Comparison studies for the project site about the 'possibilities' and, d) site bound- ary alternatives. The direction received in this study session informs and focuses the upcoming Charrette on the desired direction for the project. The consultant team 14 .,... '.i 9#x'i F^, ,. mqt s[ r°xs Analysis beyond the typical and toward truly informing all about the possibilities Scale comparison with precedent places and condi. tions for planning the Montclair Town Center Montclair, CA 2004 Analysis of the extent and use of existing circulation and paving (private - public)