Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />PARK DEVELOPMENT/JOINT USE <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE <br />September 3, 2003 <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />The meeting was convened at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall, Room 831. <br /> <br />The following Council Members were present: <br /> <br />Jose Solorio <br />Mike Garcia <br /> <br />Staffs present were: David Ream, City Manager <br />Rip Ribble, Exec. Director PRCSA <br />Gerardo Mouet, Assistant Director, PRCSA <br />Joe Fletcher, City Attorney <br />Ron Dno, Park Planning/Design Mgr., PRCSA <br /> <br />1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />ACTION ITEM: Minutes of July 1, 2003 meeting were approved as submitted. <br /> <br />2. EFFECT OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESULTS ON PARKS <br />'-- Staff presented the overall budget reduction in Parks, Recreation and Community Services <br />for FY 2002/03 and FY 2003/04. The results ofthe assessment district not passing will <br />require the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency to reduce the Parks Services <br />budget by an additional $600,000. This reduction will require the elimination of 18 full time <br />Park Maintenance Worker positions. Reduction will be based on seniority and will become <br />effective on December 31, 2003. The agency is working closely with Personnel, Work Center <br />staff and other cities to find alternative employment for staff. A recommendation will be <br />made to City Council to approve a "Golden Hand Shake" retirement package for eligible <br />Park Maintenance employees. <br />ACTION ITEM: Check on the possibility of keeping the positions to be eliminated <br />on the books, but unfunded. <br /> <br />3. DISCUSSION ON POCKET PARKS <br />Staff explained that in the early 60's California, along with other states, promoted the <br />development of pocket parks to address the need for recreational opportunities in densely <br />populated areas that were void of open space. With the passage of Proposition 13, California <br />Parks and Recreation Departments were forced to analyze the cost effectiveness of this <br />program. The analysis indicated the problems created by the mini park, out weighed the use <br />and need for improvements. These smaller remote park sites required additional man-hours <br />due to travel time lost between parks, under utilization of recreation staff, increase <br />vandalism/security, loitering, drug activity, misuse of equipment, aIld complaints from the <br />neighborhood. The City of Santa Ana developed seven pocket parks, of which only four <br />\iw remain. <br />