Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Attachment A <br /> <br />Overview, Continued <br /> <br />Allocation <br />Amounts and <br />Metho dologies <br /> <br />Allocation amoUllts can be fOUlld in Appendix A, and the allocation <br />methodology is as follows: <br /> <br />Program Subgrantee Allocation Percentage of <br /> Federal Funding <br /> Allocation Retained <br /> at State Level <br />SHSP Operational 80% of the federal fimding was 20% <br /> Areas allocated to subgrantees using a <br /> $100,000 base, with the <br /> remainder distributed on a <br /> I population basis. <br />LETPP Operational 67% of the federal fimding was 20% <br /> Areas and allocated to Operational Areas <br /> RegionalTIrreat using a $50,000 base, with the <br /> Assessment remainder distributed on a <br /> Centers population basis. <br /> (RTIAC) <br /> 13% of the federal fimding was <br /> equally distributed to four local- <br /> fUll RTIACs established in FY04 <br /> with LETPP fimding. <br />EMPG Operational 45% of the federal fimding was 55% <br /> Areas allocated to subgrantees using a <br /> $40,000 base, with the remainder <br /> distributed on a population basis. <br />VASI Pre-Selected 91.34% offederal fimding 8.66% <br /> Cities allocation to subgrantees. <br />MMRS Pre-Selected 97% of federal fimding allocation 3% <br /> Cities to subgrantees. <br />CCP NONE NONE 100% <br /> <br />Population figures were are derived from the State of California, Department <br />of Finance, E-1 City/County Population Estimates, with Annual Percent <br />Change, January 1,2002 and 2003, Sacramento, California, May 2003. This <br />table can be fOUlld at the following website address: <br />www.dof.ca.gov/htmllDemograp/E-ltext.htm <br /> <br />Continued on next page <br /> <br />FY05 Homeland Security Grant Program <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />