My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - CRAZY HORSE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
06/19/2006
>
75A - CRAZY HORSE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:45:53 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 2:17:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
6/19/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />project would not be inconsistent with the high quality <br />aesthetic environment of the Hotel Terrace area. <br /> <br />SR-55 Scenic Corridor <br /> <br />Scenic Corridors provide views of the City and largely <br />influence the public's aesthetic and visual experience. The <br />Urban Design Element identifies State Route 55 as a scenic <br />corridor. The proposed project would be consistent with the <br />Scenic Corridor Element in that the proposed project's view <br />from the SR-55 would reflect high quality design, landscape <br />treatment and lighting treatment that enhance the project site's <br />aesthetic appearance. <br /> <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which <br />would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The project site is situated within an urbanized area and is <br />surrounded by onstreet lighting. Implementation of the proposed <br />project would not introduce substantial amounts of new sources <br />of light and glare into the project area. Any lighting provided <br />on the project site would be designed and located so that all <br />direct rays are confined to the project site. <br /> <br />II. AGRICULTURE <br /> <br />A. Convert Prime Far.mland, Unique Far.mland or Far.mland of <br />Statewide Importance to non-agriculture use? <br /> <br />B. Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use or a <br />Williamson Contract? <br /> <br />C. Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, <br />due to their location or nature, could individually or <br />cumulatively result in loss of Far.mland, to non-agriculture <br />use? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the California Department of Conservation Farmland <br />Mapping and Monitoring Program, the project site does not <br />contain Unique Farmlands, Prime Farmlands or Farmlands of <br />Statewide Importance. Additionally, based on a site visit <br />conducted by the City's Environmental Coordinator, the proj ect <br />site is currently not in agricultural production. Implementation <br />of the proposed proj ect would not result in the loss of any <br />farmlands. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />75A~6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.