Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Variance No. 2006-01 <br />June 12, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Section 41-6B6 of the City's nonconforming code states that no additional <br />uses shall be allowed on a site where an existing nonconforming use <br />exists, even though such proposed use may be a conforming use in the <br />zoning district. As a result, the existing warehousing and food <br />preparation business is considered a nonconforming use; therefore, the <br />proposed real estate and mortgage office cannot be permitted on the site. <br />In order for the proposed office use to be permitted, the existing <br />industrial business must not operate on this site. <br /> <br />The State of California Government Code Section 65906 states that a <br />variance shall not be granted for a parcel of property which authorizes a <br />use that is not expressly permitted by the zone district governing the <br />parcel of property. Considering that Section 41-686 of the City's <br />nonconforming code does not allow the proposed office use on the site, <br />this section of the State code applies and therefore, does not allow the <br />proposed use to be approved. Additionally, this section implies that a <br />use variance for the proposed office use is not allowed under State codes. <br />Variances are typically reserved for variations from development standards <br />such as setbacks and parking and not uses. <br /> <br />The Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes a parking requirement for office <br />use at one parking space for each 333 square feet of office space. As <br />proposed, the site would require a total of 11 parking spaces, two parking <br />spaces for the proposed 750 square feet of second story office space and <br />nine spaces for the remaining 4,550 square feet of industrial space. <br />Approval of a variance for a parking reduction of four spaces, 36 percent, <br />will be required as the site only has seven spaces available. <br /> <br />In recent history, the Planning Commission has reviewed variances for <br />parking, each with different situations. In February of 2005, the <br />Commission reviewed Variance No. 2004-1B for the FAMSA retail chain <br />addition located at 419 East First Street. The addition required 43 <br />parking spaces, of which only 20 were being provided. This resulted in a <br />reduction of 23 parking spaces for the addition or 53 percent. In this <br />case, the Commission denied the variance request as a result of the <br />existing nonconforming parking situation. Variance No. 2002-06 for Doffo <br />Automotive located at 1607 South Sycamore was reviewed by the Commission <br />in June of 2002. A new auto repair facility was proposed that required 37 <br />parking spaces. The Commission approved a reduction of four parking <br />spaces, an 11 percent reduction, based on the nature of the business <br />operation that included the ability of the vehicle repair bays to be <br />utilized as parking spaces and the second floor office space's low parking <br /> <br />31A-4 <br />