Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Variance No. 2006-01 <br />June 12, 2006 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />implication compared to the automotive repair use. Each variance request <br />is unique to its own site; however, in the proposed case the site is <br />nonconforming in terms of parking and does not meet current development <br />standards. Considering the existing conditions, the site has maximized <br />its possible usage. <br /> <br />Staff has considered the site's conditions, including the lot size and <br />inability to provide for additional parking. The State Code states that a <br />variance shall only be granted when special circumstances apply to a <br />property in relation to size, shape, topography, location and surroundings <br />or if the local zoning ordinance deprives the property owner of privileges <br />enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning <br />designation. In this case, it has been determined that there is not a <br />special circumstance that deprives the property owner of privileges to <br />utilize the site. The current legal nonconforming industrial use on the <br />site allows the property to be fully utilized. Additionally, a parking <br />deficient site may impact the surrounding properties and aggravate the <br />residential parking situation by requiring additional parking. <br /> <br />Furthermore, the reduction of four parking spaces, 36 percent, is <br />considered high in view of the site's limited size. The applicant has <br />also presented the possibility of utilizing the parking lot across the <br />street at 1111 East Fourth Street. This site is zoned industrial and is <br />occupied by a legal nonconforming retail business that requires 150 <br />parking spaces for 30,000 square feet of building space. However, the <br />site currently has only 24 parking spaces. This request would also <br />require a variance for parking. <br /> <br />Were the Commission to consider approving the proposed action, the <br />following would be required. The Commission would have to direct staff to <br />prepare a zoning ordinance amendment to modify the nonconforming code <br />section 41-686 to allow additional uses to sites which have existing <br />nonconforming uses or direct staff to process an amendment application <br />(zone change). If a zone change would be requested, most likely a <br />Specific Development (SD) zone would have to be created to accommodate for <br />the site's unique mix of uses and site development conditions. As the <br />Commission may recall, a Work Study Session was held earlier this year <br />relative to amending the nonconforming code to allow for expansions of <br />nonconforming uses in the Commercial South Main (CSM) zone. The <br />Commission stated that the City's existing nonconforming policies and <br />codes should be upheld. Additionally, the project site is located within <br /> <br />31A-5 <br />