My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - SUPERSTORE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
08/07/2006
>
75A - SUPERSTORE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:45:01 PM
Creation date
8/2/2006 11:08:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
8/7/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to the Municipal Code to <br />establish an ordinance for the regulation of Big Box retail uses <br />would not result in adverse impacts to any scenic vista, or <br />scenic resource, in that future Big Box retail uses implemented <br />under the proposed ordinance would not be located in areas that <br />contain scenic vistas. Additionally, Big Box retail uses would <br />not be located within State Highways. <br /> <br />C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or <br />quality of the site and its surroundings? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to the Municipal Code to <br />establish an ordinance for the regulation of Big Box retail uses <br />would not degrade the visual character of the City, in that the <br />proposed ordinance would establish criteria to help minimize <br />potential visual impacts associated with location and operation <br />of Big Box retail uses. Through the conditional use permit <br />process, proposed Big Box retail uses would be subject to site <br />plan review to ensure compliance with the standards established <br />in the proposed ordinance as well as evaluated for potential <br />aesthetic impacts. <br /> <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which <br />would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed amendment to the Municipal Code to regulate Big Box <br />retail uses would not introduce substantial amounts of new light <br />and glare impacts, in that the proposed ordinance would <br />establish criteria to regulate onsite lighting. Additionally, <br />Big Box retail uses permitted under the proposed ordinance would <br />typically be located in areas with onsite or nearby street <br />lighting. <br /> <br />II. AGRICULTURE <br /> <br />A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of <br />Statewide Importance to non-agriculture use? <br />B. Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use or a <br />Williamson Contract? <br /> <br />75A,~ 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.