My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS 1-2006
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
G
>
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS 1-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 2:54:13 PM
Creation date
8/15/2006 11:15:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Contract #
A-2006-174
Agency
Finance & Management Services
Council Approval Date
7/3/2006
Expiration Date
1/31/2007
Insurance Exp Date
8/1/2009
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3. RFP Development. GFOA knows that governments can utilize a rapid RFP development <br />approach at significantly less cost and government staff effort than often employed by traditional <br />consultants. We will embed in the RFP your functional (e.g., ABC/ABM) and technological <br />(e.g., workflow, web-enablement) goals. The RFP will also include an interfaces attachment that <br />will describe the City's existing third party systems that will work with the ERP solution. In <br />addition, GFOA will add sections of the RFP, such as provision of desired technology <br />infrastructure and vendor references. <br /> <br />We will work with the City to create an RFP, which will illicit proposals that can be easily <br />understood and analyzed. Too often, when proposals are received, it is difficult to make an <br />'apples to apples' comparison of costs or even to make a basic comparison of cost proposals. We <br />will provide you with a matrix that will significantly improve the ability to compare software and <br />implementation service costs and staffing requirements. <br /> <br />The City's main role during this step is to facilitate the GFOA process by providing City <br />boilerplate terms and conditions that must be included in the RFP and conveying any other <br />pertinent procurement policies and procedures. Two deliverables. initial draft of RFP Text for <br />City Review and Final Draft RFP Document. <br /> <br />Plu1se I Deliverables: <br /> <br />Deliverable I: Project Plan. <br /> <br />Deliverable 2: Draft Set of Comprehensive City Business Requirements. <br /> <br />Deliverable 3: Initial Draft of RFP Textfor City Review. <br /> <br />Deliverable 4: Validated Set of Comprehensive City Business Requirements. <br /> <br />Deliverable 5: Final Draft RFP document. (City issues the final RFP as a formal procurement function of <br />the City). <br /> <br />/'//\ ~'f." /I <br />."'nl('1JI "dec1101l "'H'rricf\ <br /> <br />Definition of Phase. Phase II begins when the RFP is released and ends after the completion of <br />deliverables and when two vendors are identified for competitive negotiations. <br /> <br />GFOA's methodology during System Selection is one of elevation rather than elimination <br />through the various phases. The City will be expected to elevate no more than three vendors <br />(from all qualified proposals received) to the Software Demonstration phase. The City will then <br />be expected to elevate no more than two vendors to the Discovery and Contract Negotiation <br />phase. <br /> <br />The City will need to identify a core evaluation team to assist GFOA in Phase II activities. <br />Proposal evaluation teams are usually cross-functional with representation from all key areas <br />(Finance, HR, IT, Purchasing, etc.) within the City. The size for evaluation teams can vary but <br /> <br />QBCHI\389010.6 <br /> <br />Government Finance Officers Association <br /> <br />9 of] 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.