Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />~C:;;1:~~lW"~~~~"'" <br />" - ,. _.." ... . ,..'..,^,..".,"~".."...,2~1E':". <br /> <br />!"" .' <br />~ '.., <br />~ <br />; ~ <br />'" 10 <br />z <br />i1 <br />~ 10 <br />~ 40 <br /> <br />.. <br />,~ OIl <br />~:?~, <br />~. '.~, <br /> <br />.!~:~-:./O' <br /> <br /> <br />, "".:,;~:!(~";~;"Fji{i~~',(:':',: . ' . ". ,.r.;,~:::::~:: <br />II,~~:~J,1E~f!i~tt~~~rr~~!tr~.~~~r:~'0:;li:~j~l~~~' <br /> <br />. <br />-.1IETAIL , <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />'Q 11 12 <br />NOON <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />HOUR OF THE DAY <br /> <br />WEEKDAY <br /> <br />100 ..... <br />..... <br /> <br />.. <br />.' <br />.' <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />'- /fES/DENT/AL ..... <br />. <br />'-... ..,:.- <br /> <br />?-/~ <br />.. ",', /' <br /> <br />- -'" ....j <br /> <br />. <br />, -.a_.. <br /> <br />. <br />'. <br />'. <br /> <br />..~. <br /> <br />z <br />o 10 <br />S <br />" <br />2 ~ <br />B <br />.. <br />" 10 <br />z <br />;; <br />~ 10 <br /> <br />~ 10 <br />.. <br />" <br />!; OIl <br />~ <br />~ 20 <br /> <br />: , <br />: 1 CINEMA <br /> <br />/fETAIL I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'. <br />.... <br /> <br />I <br />f ,_::~~:::;-- <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ID <br /> <br />. "~., ',' ':' :; <br />':""rJ~;;'~,;. <br /> <br />. 'H~.:;~: 2f~,~.~\;ii.,~.~l:"[::~~}~2:;:~ ~;1r,;:.~:j?fi{~~:i.[; <br /> <br />31A,..&7 <br /> <br />A C' ~ ._ ._ ~ ---. 1_ ~ _ O!} I rTTI)fl)r.lr7f1 n filfiV"lfll <br /> <br />;}' <br /> <br />Shared parking may occur in suburban developments if walking <br />distances are not far and land uses are functionally related. <br /> <br />transit use, thus representing the maximum parking <br />accumulation occurring on a given day. Hourly ac- <br />cumulation curves (developed from hourly counts at <br />freestanding developments) for each individual land <br />use (see Figure 2) indicate the variation in parking <br />accumulation throughout a given day. Seasonal vari- <br />ation in parking demand at each land use (see Figure <br />3) was developed from management data supplied <br />by developers and in-house historical data. The peak <br />parking demands calculated from the parking de- <br />mand factors in Figure 1 correspond to 100 percent <br />of peak parking accumulation for each land use indi- <br />cated on the hourly curves in Figure 2 and the <br />monthly data in Figure 3. <br />By combining the results for single land uses with <br />survey data for mixed-use developments. it was pos- <br />sible to document the effects of shared parking on <br />total parking space requirements, This was shown in <br />terms of the reduced number of parking spaces <br />needed to serve peak activity periods. <br />The survey data also disclosed the potential for <br />multiple "levels of reduction" in parking space based <br />on the different impacts of time and inter-land use <br /> <br />;;.. <br /> <br />, I <br />