31A - 2303 S BRISTOL CUP - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FigRre'..l .,;.:;;' ,;"" ,. ." Representative Peak~~r~lltpem~ridFac,t~~s/;,:' Vnl"t :",," 'i,."'.',:';. " 'i", W, e,'.ek.d. ay" ~~':'}:~l" . . . . Parking spaces per 1:~"Q6o 5q.ft. GtA' .,"-' <,.::..3.,00, ',:' ~~:~t::~~ ~~~~~~ ~~:: ~:~~:~ ~~:~:i: gt~..,) );;}~~l.~,~,/ Parking spaces per y;6b ,s, J~tt ,,-~;\:; Parking spaces per s Parking spaces per Parking spaces ~~r. Parking spaces p'er Parking spaces per: Parking space~"",p,er' l \ Land V se J o fti ce Retail (< 400,000 sq,ft.) Retail (> 600,000 sq,ft.) Restaurant Ci nema Residential Hotel Guest Room Resta uran tlLounge Conference Rooms Conventiofl Area J IPer olle auto owned per dwelling unit. ,,)~}~;(;:::; ~Factoredup to 100 percent auto Lise from the SO pel'~el1t: :IUsed by Ilollguests; the given rates, thus, are upper b,9llll . "r; . l i 31A,..sS I E'" I ';i~_~I8lI~~ I Procedure I'arkin~ demand can be observed at existing ll1ixed-use developments. If such prc~jects have their own parkin~ facilities, it is possible to count the ac- cUll1ulation of parked vehicles and determine the peak parking demand. The latter would represent an a~~re~ate value for all of the land lIses ill the de- velopment. The issue for research, however. was how this a~~re~ate value compared to the sum of the peak parking demand for the individual land uses. That is, in order to study shared parkin~. it was nec- essary to study. independently. the parking space de- mand characteristics of each component of a mixed- use development and to estimate the effects on de- mand due to the combination of these uses. Thus. the first step was,to study the parkillgspace demand generated by significant individual land uses in situations where unit peak parking demalld would be at maximum levels. Typical freestanding s~lbur- ball land uses produce maximum unit parkin~ de- mand primarily because sufficiellt parking space is available and transit use is insignificant. By first identifyin~ parking demand at such "unconstrained" freestanding single land uses, other effects such as transit use and capti\'e market relationships could be isolated. Analysis The results of' the first step of the analysis estab- lished parking space demand characteristics at six single land uses. defined in terms of peak unit de- mand. hourly accumulation, and seasonal variation. Peak unit demands (see Figure 1) were developed on the basis of occupied land use units and negligible "''',0'-;1': ,. . ~ ": ITIBJBf.ili!] I1IITi!ID /Se pte m be r 83 3