My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - 320 WEST FOURTH
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
12/18/2006
>
75A - 320 WEST FOURTH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:42:49 PM
Creation date
12/13/2006 11:03:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
12/18/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood <br />and regional parks or other recreational facilities such <br />that substantial physical deterioration of the facility <br />would occur or be accelerated? <br /> <br />Less than significant impact. <br /> <br />The proposed project will not result in a substantial or <br />significant increase in residents and employees in the area. <br />However, the proj ect does propose an onsi te courtyard at the <br />street level, and may be used for passive recreation. Since <br />this project is infill development, and is of a relatively small <br />scale, the proj ect does not affect long term City goals for <br />recreational land uses. Impacts will be less than significant. <br /> <br />B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require <br />the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, <br />which might have an adverse physical effect on the <br />environment. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />A roof deck lS proposed that will allow for additional <br />recreational space for residents. No adverse impacts would <br />occur as a result of these new recreation facilities. <br /> <br />XIV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC <br /> <br />A. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the <br />street system? <br /> <br />B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of <br />service standard established by the county congestion <br />management agency for designated roads or highways? <br /> <br />Less than significant impacts <br /> <br />It is proj ected that implementation of this proposed proj ect <br />would result in an increase of 80 daily trips with a four A.M. <br />peak hour trips and seven P.M. peak hour trips. This is not <br />considered a substantial increase to existing traffic load and <br />capacity of the street system. <br /> <br />The Circulation Element of <br />minimum acceptable Level <br /> <br />the City of Santa Ana <br />of Service to be a "D" <br /> <br />states <br />for <br /> <br />that <br />maJor <br /> <br />75A~65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.