My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 100 SOUTH MAIN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
01/02/2007
>
31A - 100 SOUTH MAIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:42:30 PM
Creation date
12/27/2006 12:04:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
1/2/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Variance No. 2006-14 <br />December 11, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />At the November 27, 2006 Planning Commission public hearing, several <br />issues were raised that resulted in the Planning Commission continuing <br />the item. Specifically, the Commission requested additional information <br />regarding ways to install the sign while minimizing damage to the <br />building, the potential of the applicant removing existing signage, the <br />appropriateness of the signage on the elevation, and clarification on <br />the status of the billboards on top of the restaurant. <br /> <br />First, staff had discussions with two of the larger sign companies <br />regarding the installation of signage on brick buildings. Both <br />indicated that holes in brick that were caused by signage can be <br />repaired to a level that is almost unnoticeable. They stated that sign <br />companies subcontract brick repair work to masonry contractors, who have <br />the expertise in repairing brick. As the proposed sign will be at least <br />15 feet above pedestrian level, the eventual repair of the brick will <br />not be noticeable. <br /> <br />Second, the applicant took into consideration the comment by the <br />Planning Commission regarding the amount of signage on the building. He <br />has indicated a desire to minimize the potential of visual blight on the <br />building by removing two existing signs. The applicant has agreed to <br />remove two signs: the cabinet sign on the east elevation for the "Artist <br />Studios" and the "Original Mike's" painted wall sign on the west <br />elevation. To formalize this request, the applicant has submitted a <br />letter relinquishing the rights conferred under Variance No. 2004-07 (E) <br />for the cabinet sign and (F) for the painted wall sign. <br /> <br />Third, staff analyzed the north building fa9ade in an effort to <br />determine the appropriate level of signage for this elevation. Since <br />the City's sign code generally limits signage to one sign per building <br />elevation, several factors can be considered. First, the length of the <br />elevation (105 feet) is sufficient in size to accommodate multiple <br />signs. Variances have been approved in the past when it was determined <br />that the length of the elevation was sufficient to accommodate <br />additional signage without contributing to visual clutter, including the <br />Target store on West Seventeenth Street and the Albertson's market on <br />South Bristol Street. Second, the overall square footage of the <br />elevation is sufficient to accommodate more than one sign. The north <br />elevation is approximately 3,600 square feet in size, while the existing <br />marquee sign is only 104 square feet. Given the large wall area, an <br />additional sign that is approximately 50 square feet in size would not <br />be considered a proliferation of signs. Finally, the elevation has two <br />distinct facades, one at the northeast corner of the building with a <br /> <br />31A-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.