My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 100 SOUTH MAIN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
01/02/2007
>
31A - 100 SOUTH MAIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:42:30 PM
Creation date
12/27/2006 12:04:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
1/2/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Variance No. 2006-14 <br />December 11, 2006 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />tiled roof, decorative <br />a flat fa9ade further <br />tenant spaces in the <br />signs. <br /> <br />balustrades and storefront windows, and the other <br />west. If this building was subdivided into two <br />future, the building would be allowed multiple <br /> <br />Finally, questions regarding the two roof mounted billboards were raised <br />by the Commission. The removal of the billboards was part of the sales <br />agreement for the City owned lot currently used as the outdoor patio for <br />the restaurant. The sales agreement required the removal of the <br />billboards but allowed the applicant the ability to apply for a variance <br />to maintain the larger billboard. The billboards have not been removed <br />from the premises as the sales agreement has not been approved by the <br />City Council. However, in conjunction with Variance No. 2004-07, the <br />applicant applied for, and was denied, a variance to allow the larger <br />billboard to be used as signage for the restaurant. <br /> <br />Staff has consistently recommended against variance requests for signage <br />which constitute a proliferation of signs. However, given the size and <br />design of the north elevation and the fact that the applicant will be <br />required to remove two previously approved existing signs, this <br />additional sign will not result in a proliferation of signage or visual <br />blight on a building that has been adaptively reused into a high quality <br />building. Therefore, based on the above analysis, staff recommends that <br />the Planning Commission approve Variance No. 2006-14 as conditioned. <br /> <br />CEQA Compliance <br /> <br />This proj ect was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the <br />California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt from <br />further review pursuant to Section 15311. This Class 11 exemption <br />applies to a project that involves the construction of minor structures <br />accessory to existing commercial buildings including the construction of <br />on-premise signs. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2006- <br />177 will be filed for this project. <br /> <br />---z....., <br />Vince Fregos <br />Senior Plann <br /> <br /> <br />VF:jm <br />vf\reports\va06-14.121106.pc <br /> <br />31A-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.