My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 19 - Agreement for Pavement Managment Program Update
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
04/01/2025
>
Item 19 - Agreement for Pavement Managment Program Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 4:37:21 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 2:22:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
19
Date
4/1/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o' CTA &GO Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines <br />Local Tax Dollars at Work <br />4. Conduct the distress inspection by walking on the pavement shoulder or sidewalk adjacent <br />to the sample unit being surveyed, measuring the quantity of each severity level of every <br />distress type present, and recording the data. Each distress must correspond in type and <br />severity to that described in the Paver Distress Identification Manuals. <br />5. A copy of the recorded distress data should be provided on a weekly basis to the <br />responsible agency personnel for quality assurance. <br />It should be noted that windshield surveys, while reasonably fast and inexpensive, do have <br />shortcomings. Chief among these are that low severity distresses are difficult to identify in this <br />procedure, and consequently, the PCI may be significantly higher than it ought to be. A pavement <br />may therefore be selected for a slurry seal when a thin overlay is more appropriate or for a thin <br />overlay when a thick overlay is more appropriate. This may result in treatments that are not cost- <br />effective. <br />When certain pavements are a high priority (usually those with high traffic volumes or other <br />distinctive features) for a local agency, walking surveys are preferred to ensure that all pertinent <br />distresses are captured, although windshield surveys are the minimum standard. For residential <br />or local streets, windshield surveys are acceptable. <br />When automated or semi -automated surveys are used, the following procedure should be <br />followed. <br />The Local Agency should: <br />Establish a series of test sites <br />Determine the distress data on those sites using a walking survey <br />Compare the data from the automated equipment with the walking survey data. <br />It is desirable for the PCI values from the automated survey to be within plus or minus five PCI <br />points of the values obtained from the walking survey. However, plus or minus ten PCI points is <br />generally considered acceptable. Any site with a difference greater than ten PCI points should be <br />carefully rechecked to determine the cause for the discrepancy. The agency must then make a <br />judgement whether the automated data is acceptable. <br />OCTA's role is limited to the evaluation of the distress data submitted by the agencies and does <br />not include a verification or evaluation of the automated equipment or procedure used by the <br />agency submitting the automated survey. <br />Inspection Frequency <br />All streets identified on the MPAH must be surveyed at least once every two years. All local streets <br />must be surveyed at least once every six years. This is a requirement of OCTA's PMP certification <br />program. <br />Effective March 2024 2-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.