My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 1044 EAST FOURTH
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
04/16/2007
>
31A - 1044 EAST FOURTH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:40:26 PM
Creation date
4/11/2007 12:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
4/16/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />vehicles with trailers were observed at either store on the study days. This was despite the fact that a <br />large number of customers used the lumber yard. Conversations with store staff revealed that <br />Saturdays typically see mostly residential customers and that the contractors typically frequent the <br />stores on weekdays. It is on those days that employees report seeing vehicles towing trailers. Even <br />so, the overall proportion oftrai]ers is apparently small compared to the overall number of parked <br />cars. As mentioned before, the lumber yards are built to accommodate vehicles parking and turning <br />around with trailers. <br /> <br />Customer Activity <br /> <br />During the same time that the parking inventories were being conducted, a constant count of <br />customers entering the store was being collected. This count included every person entering the <br />store, though a distinction was made between visiting customers and visiting children. Specifically, <br />visiting customers are defined as adults with purchasing power that visit the store (chi]dren who <br />accompany their parents do not have purchasing power and are therefore not considered visiting <br />customers). To more closely correspond with potentia] transactions, two adults entering the store as <br />a couple were counted as "one customer," <br /> <br />The number of visiting customers entering the store relates directly to the number of parking spaces <br />occupied in the parking lot. More specifically, the number of customers entering the store during <br />successive hours of the day combined with the average time customers spend in the store results in <br />the number of vehicles parked in the parking lot at any given time. Table 2 summarizes the peak <br />hour of customer activity and the peak hour of parking demand for each study store. <br /> <br />Table 2 - Peak Hours of Customer Activitv and ParkinR Demand <br />Customers <br />Entering the <br />Store During <br />Peak Hour* <br />133 <br />125 <br /> <br />Store # <br /> <br />Store Name <br /> <br />Peak Hour of <br />Customers <br />Entering the Store* <br /> <br />Time of Peak <br />Parking Demand <br /> <br />Parking Spaces <br />Occupied at <br />Peak <br /> <br />703 MONTEBELLO 8 to 9 AM <br />705 POMONA 11 to 12 noon <br />"Excludes children. Couples were counted as "1 customer." <br /> <br />2PM <br />3 PM <br /> <br />88 <br />99 <br /> <br />As shown in Table 2, the peak hour of customer activity at each store (entering the store) occurred <br />before noon. Whi]e one store experienced its peak between 8 and 9 AM, the other experienced its <br />peak between] ] AM and ]2 noon. However, both expenenced theIr heavIest pen ods of customer <br />activity between 8 AM and ]2 noon (see Table 3). In contrast, the peak time of parking occupancy <br />occurred in the afternoon (2 PM at one store, and 3 PM at the other). In genera], the peak parking <br />demand occurs two to three hours after the end ofthe peak morning period of customer activity. Due <br />to the complexity of the relationship between the number of customers entering the store and the <br />time each spends in the store, there is no direct correlation between number of customers entering <br />the store and number of vehicles parked in the parking lot. Instead, the peak parking occupancy is <br />typically correlated with the amount of daily business a store transacts. Detai]ed counts of <br />customers entering the store and the corresponding number of parking spaces occupied for each hour <br />ofthe study are presented in Appendix B. <br /> <br />In terms of customers and transactions, if a visiting customer purchases something in the store, <br />he/she becomes a transaction. (Contractors' Warehouse's data lists transactions as "customers," but <br /> <br />Parking Study of Two Contractors Warehouse Stores - Final Report <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />A-15 <br /> <br />31A-33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.