My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75D - PH ZONING ORD AND CUP CALIFORNIA PALMS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
07/16/2007
>
75D - PH ZONING ORD AND CUP CALIFORNIA PALMS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:38:52 PM
Creation date
7/11/2007 1:42:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75D
Date
7/16/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: <br />A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported <br />by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No <br />Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact <br />simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). <br />A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general <br />standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on aproject-specific <br />screening analysis). <br />All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, <br />cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational <br />impacts. <br />III. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If <br />there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is <br />required. <br />IV. "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation <br />measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact". <br />The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to <br />a less than significant level. <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially with Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />I. Aesthetics -Would the project: <br />A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ^ ^ ® ^ <br />B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited ^ ^ ^ <br /> to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings <br /> within a state highway? <br />C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character <br /> or quality of the site and its surroundings? ^ ^ ^ <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br /> which would adversely affect day or nighttime views <br /> in the area? ^ ^ ^ <br />California Palms <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3-4 <br />75D-61 <br />May 2007 <br />das ozes.a~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.