My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2007-07-16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
07/16/2007
>
FULL PACKET_2007-07-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:38:39 PM
Creation date
7/11/2007 1:50:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
7/16/2007
Destruction Year
2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
328
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- ~ - Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> Less Than. <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ^ ^ ^ <br />the site or area, including through the alteration of <br />the course of stream or river, or substantially <br />increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a <br />manner which would result in flooding on or off- <br />site? <br />D. Create or contribute runoff water which would ^ ^ ® ^ <br />exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater drainage systems or provide <br />substantial additional sources of polluted run-off? <br />E. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as ^ ^ ® ^ <br />mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or <br />Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br />delineation map? <br />F. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which ^ ^ ® ^ <br />would impede or redirect flood flows? <br />G. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as ^ ^ ® ^ <br />mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or <br />Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br />delineation map? <br />IX. Land Use and Planning -Would the project: <br />A. Physically divide an established community? ^ ^ ^ <br />B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, ^ ^ ® ^ <br />or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br />project (including, but not limited to the general <br />plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation ^ ^ ^ <br />plan or natural community conservation plan? <br />California Palms May 2007 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3-9 <br />75 D ~~ ~ das ores o~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.