My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2007-07-16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
07/16/2007
>
FULL PACKET_2007-07-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:38:39 PM
Creation date
7/11/2007 1:50:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
7/16/2007
Destruction Year
2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
328
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ \ ~ Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />X. Mineral Resources- Would the project: <br />A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- ^ ^ ^ <br />important mineral resource recovery site <br />delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or <br />other land use plan? <br />XI. Noise -Would the project result in: <br />A. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise ^ ® ^ ^ <br />levels in excess of standards established in the <br />local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable <br />standards of other agencies? <br />B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ^ ^ ® ^ <br />groundborne vibration or groundborne noise <br />levels? <br />C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ^ ^ ® ^ <br />levels in the project vicinity above levels existing <br />without the project? <br />D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ^ ^ ® ^ <br />ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above <br />levels existing without project? <br />E. For a project located within an airport land use ^ ^ ® ^ <br />plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, <br />within two miles of a public airport or public use <br />airport, would the project expose people residing or <br />working in the project area to excessive noise <br />levels? <br />California Palms May 2007 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3-10 <br />75D-67 850296.0' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.