Laserfiche WebLink
o SA College has an excellent program they need to focus on sending <br />kids to SA College instead of the high universities. <br />o The $25,000 marketing payment to the city, how long is it for? <br />o Who provides the equipment storage at the stadium? <br />o They need to serve S.A. residents. <br />o Can the stadium be used for practices or do they have to go to other <br />fields? <br />o The city's reservation team meets weekly. COFU meets monthly and <br />makes recommendations to the city on facility use. <br />• Julie Stroud: <br />o The Board of Recreation and Parks representative at COFU only <br />indicated the RFP was mentioned at COFU. <br />o She was concerned that ConsquistAmerica's program only represents <br />boys not girls. <br />o The program needs to serve younger children. <br />o ConquistAmerica is strong on the educational component, not the <br />recreational component. <br />o ConquistAmerica only serves 55 kids; they need to serve more kids. <br />o Are the practices on Tuesday and Thursday going to be at Godinez <br />High School and. the Saturday and Sunday games at the Stadium? <br />Vince Sarmiento: <br />o Expressed appreciation for everyone's involvement in this matter. Now <br />there's some structure to identify and serve Santa Ana kids. With the <br />completion of the synthetic turf fields we are at the stage to allocate <br />fields. <br />o Conquest America has a proven program to serve kids in education <br />and athletics. We need to serve both sexes. <br />o This subcommittee needs to provide direction and analyze if this is a <br />fair process. <br />o Do we want to revisit the process since 2/3 of the nine organizations <br />were ineligible or limit the term of the agreement to one year? <br />^ Response: We should probably revisit the process, but not limit the <br />term. <br />Claudia Alvarez: <br />o Will not support the one year term of the agreement. <br />o Concern of the potential conflict that exist with one of the council <br />members and the company. <br />o Feels the process was not fair and the public was not aware this item <br />was going to be discussed at COFU and Board meetings. <br />o The synthetic turf project was approved with the understanding it will <br />serve more participants and not exclusive to one organization. <br />o If it is such a good program, why shouldn't we make it available for <br />free? <br />^ Response: It is free to the players. <br />PREY Special Meeting -Minutes 4 July 30, 2007 <br />13B-10 <br />