Laserfiche WebLink
continues to be wholly illegal since it is classified as a Schedule I drug. As such, there <br />are no exceptions to its illegality. The mere categorization of marijuana as "medical" by <br />some states fails to carve out any legally recognized exception regarding the drug. <br />Marijuana, in any form, is neither valid nor legal. <br />C early the United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the land. Its <br />decisions are final and binding upon ail lower courts. The court invoked the United <br />States Supremacy Clause and the Commerce Clause in reaching its decision. The <br />Supremacy Clause declares that all laws made in pursuance of the Constitution shall be <br />the "supreme law of the land" and shall be legally superior to any conflicting provision of <br />a state constitution or law. s The Commerce Clause states that "the Congress shall have <br />power to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and <br />with the Indian Tribes."~ <br />Gonzales v. Raich addressed the concerns of two California individuals growing <br />and using marijuana under our state's medical marijuana statute. The court explained <br />that under the Controlled Substances Act marijuana is a Schedule I drug and is strictly <br />regulated. "Schedule I drugs are categorized as such because of their high potential for <br />abuse, lack of any accepted medical use, and absence of any accepted safety for use in <br />medically supervised treatment."K The court ruled that the Commerce Clause is <br />applicable to California individuals growing and obtaining marijuana for their own <br />personal, medical use. Under the Supremacy Clause, the federal .regulation of marijuana, <br />pursuant to the Commerce Clause, supersedes any state's regulation, including <br />Californ.ia's. Th.e court found that the California statutes did not provide any federal <br />defense if a person is brought into federal. court for cultivating or possessing marijuana. <br />Accordingly, there is no federal exception for the growth, cultivation, use or <br />possession of marijuana and all such activity remains illegal.9 California's <br />Compassionate Use Act of 1996 and Medical Marijuana Program Act of 2004 do not <br />create an exception to this federal law. Al.l marijuana activity i absolutely illegal and <br />subject to federal regulation and prosecution. <br />California Law <br />On November 5, 199b, California voters adopted Proposition 215, an initiative <br />statute authorizing the medical. use of ma~~ijuana. "' The initiative added Health and <br />Safety code section 1.1362.5 which allows "seriously i.11 Californians the right to obtain <br />and use marijuana for medical purposes where that medical use is deemed appropriate <br />and has been recommended by a physician ...."1' The codified section is known as the <br />Compassionate Use Act of :1996.'z Additionally, the state legislature passed Senate Bill. <br />420 in 2003; i.t became the Medical Marijuana Program Act and took effect on January 1, <br />2004.13 This act expanded the definitions of "patient" and "primary caregiversl~ and <br />created guidelines for identification cards.15 It defined the amount of marijuana that <br />"patients" and "primary caregivers" can possess.' It also created a Iimi.ted affirmative <br />defense to criminal prosecution far qualifying individuals that collectively gather to <br />cultivate medical marijuana.l~ <br />Despite their illegality, the medical marijuana laws in California are specific. The <br />statutes craft narrow affirmative defenses for particular individuals with respect to <br />enumerated marijuana activity. All conduct, and people engaging in it, that falls outside <br />75A-66 <br />