Laserfiche WebLink
of the statutes' parameters remains illegal under California law. Relatively few <br />individuals will be able to assert the affirmative defense i.n the statute. To use it a person <br />must be a "qualified patient", "primary caregiver", or a member of a "cooperative". <br />Once they are charged with a crime, if a person can prove an applicable legal status, they <br />are entitled to assert this statutory defense. <br />A strict construction of California law <br />The California Attorney General, Bill Lockyer, has also spoken on medical <br />marijuana. His office issued a bulletin to California law enforcement agencies on June 9, <br />2005. The office expressed the opinion that Gonzales v. Raich did not address the <br />validity of the California statutes and, therefore, had no effect on California law. The <br />office advised law enforcement to not change their operating procedures. The Attorney <br />General made the recommendation that law enforcement neither arrest nor prosecute <br />"individuals within the legal scope of California's Compassionate Use Act." <br />When California's medical marijuana laws are strictly eonsta~ued our two offices <br />come to a point of agreement. We believe that Gonzales v. Raich does afi~ect California <br />law. However, we also acknowledge that the California statutes offer some legal <br />protection to "individuals within the legal scope oP' the acts. The medical. marijuana <br />laws speak to patients, primary caregivers, and true collectives. These people are <br />expressly mentioned in the statutes and, if their conduct comports to the law, may have <br />some state legal protection for specified marijuana activity. Conversely, all medical <br />marijuana establishments that fall outside the letter and spirit of the statutes are not legal; <br />including dispensaries and store-front facilities. These establishments have no legal <br />protection. The Attorney General's opinion does not present a contrary view. <br />Conduct <br />Health and safety code sections 11362.765 and 1.1362.775 describe the conduct <br />for which the affirmative defense is available. If a person qualifies as a "patien.t", <br />"primary caregiver", or is a member of a legally recognized "cooperative" they have an <br />affirmative defense to possessing a defined amount of marijuana. Under the statute no <br />more than eight ounces of dried marijuana can be possessed. Addi.tional.ly, either six <br />mature or twelve immature plants may be possessed.ls Note that if someone claims <br />patient or primary caregiver status, and possesses more than this amount of marijuana, he <br />can be prosecuted for drug possession. The qualifying individuals may also cultivate, <br />plant, harvest, dry, and/or process marijuana; but while still strictly observing the <br />permitted amount of the drug. The statute may also provide a limited affirmative defense <br />for possessing marijuana for sale, transporting it, giving it away, maintaining a marijuana <br />house, knowingly providing a space where marijuana can be accessed, and creating a <br />narcotic nuisance. ~~ <br />However, for anyone who cannot lay claim to the appropriate status under the <br />statutes: all instances of marijuana possession, cultivation, planting, harvesting, drying, <br />processing, possession for the purposes of sales, completed sales, giving away, <br />administration, transportation., maintaining of marijuana houses, knowingly providing a <br />75A-67 <br />