Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />II <br />~ 1 ~ Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />A-3 Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The site is within an area identified <br />as having a potential for soil liquefaction when subject to a seismic event (Associated Soils <br />Engineering 2006). The term liquefaction describes a phenomenon in which a saturated, <br />cohesion less soil loses strength and acquires a degree of mobility as a result of strong <br />ground shaking during an earthquake (Associated Soils Engineering 2006). The factors <br />known to influence liquefaction potential include soil type and depth, grain size, relative <br />density, groundwater level, degree of saturation, and both the intensity and duration of <br />ground shaking (Associated Soils Engineering 2006). Catastrophic failure of structures due <br />to soil liquefaction is not expected at the site, but the ground shaking associated with a large <br />magnitude earthquake would likely cause settlement and/or small scale lateral displacements <br />in local areas (Associated Soils Engineering 2006). <br />All demolition would occur in accordance with building and safety standards as specified by <br />the City Building Division. All site preparation (including grading) and construction of the <br />residential units would occur in accordance with building and safety standards as specified <br />by the City Building Division, which inherently provide for measures to reduce the potential <br />impacts of liquefaction to structures. In addition, the geotechnical study provides for certain <br />design measures during site preparation, excavation, grading, and construction, which would <br />also reduce any potential impacts related to liquefaction (Associated Soils Engineering 2006). <br />These design measures include, but are not limited to: <br />• Specific site preparation and grading techniques to reduce liquefaction impacts such <br />as over excavation. <br />• Additional testing for the degree of soil expansion on site during or after rough <br />grading operations. <br />• Specific foundation designs to reduce provide sound structural design on potentially <br />expansive soils. <br />• Conformance of foundation design and asphalt design to Greenbook requirements. <br />Therefore, the impacts to structures can be mitigated to less than significant with the <br />implementation of mitigation measure GEO-1. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />GEO-1. To mitigate the effects of liquefaction, the applicant will follow the safety and <br />building standards specified by the City Building Division as well as implement the <br />appropriate combination of design recommendations outlined in the Associated Soils <br />Engineering (2006) geotechnical report (Appendix B). The engineering plans will be <br />submitted to the City's Building Department for a plan check along with the geotechnical <br />report and will receive appropriate approvals and clearances prior to construction <br />occurring onsite. <br />A-4 No Impact. The project area is generally flat, and implementation of the proposed <br />project would not require slope cuts that could result in landslides. There is no indication that <br />recent landslides or unstable slope conditions exist on or adjacent to the project site that <br />would otherwise result in a landslide hazard to the proposed project (Associated Soils <br />Engineering 2006). According to the Seismic Hazards Zone Map, the site is not located <br />within an area identified as having a potential for earthquake-induced landslides (CGS 1998 <br />in Associated Soils Engineering 2006). Therefore, no impacts associated with landslides <br />would occur. <br />Alton Court August 2007 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3-23 <br />J&S 00635.07 <br />75A-89 <br />