Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Checklist <br />~~~~~~~ For CEQA Compliance <br />B. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is currently developed and consists of <br />60% of impermeable surfaces (asphalt, concrete, and buildings) and approximately 40% of <br />hard-packed unpaved sun`aces. Furthermore, low topographic relief on site is not significant; <br />therefore, impacts associated with substantial erosion or loss of topsoil would be less than <br />significant during construction or post-construction of the proposed project. <br />C. No Impact. The project site has been previously developed and does not contain any unique <br />geological or physical feature. No impact would occur. <br />D. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. According to City of Santa Ana <br />General Plan Land Use Element, the proposed project is not located in an area of <br />subsidence (City of Santa Ana 1998: A-40). The project area is generally flat, and there is no <br />indication that recent landslides or unstable slope conditions exist on or adjacent to the <br />project site that would otherwise result in a landslide hazard to the proposed project <br />(Associated Soils Engineering 2006). However, the project is located in an area of high to <br />very high liquefaction (City of Santa Ana 1998: A-40, Associated Soils Engineering 2006). <br />All demolition would occur in accordance with building and safety standards as specified by <br />the City Building Division. All site preparation (including grading) and construction of the <br />residential units would occur in accordance with building and safety standards as specified <br />by the City Building Division, which inherently provide for measures to reduce the potential <br />impacts of liquefaction to structures. In addition, the geotechnical study provides for certain <br />design measures during site preparation, excavation, grading, and construction, which would <br />also reduce any potential impacts related to liquefaction to less than significant (Associated <br />Soils Engineering, 2006). Therefore, the impacts to structures can be mitigated to less than <br />significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1 identified above. <br />E. No Impact. Sewer access is available throughout the project area. No septic tanks or <br />alternative wastewater disposal systems are included as part of the proposed project. The <br />project site would tie into existing 8-inch sewer line located along South Fairview Street. No <br />impacts would occur. <br />VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />A. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Implementation of the proposed <br />project may be associated with the disposal of hazardous substances as a result of the <br />demolition of the various structures. Development of the proposed project would require the <br />demolition of existing interior and exterior features on the site. The buildings on site were <br />constructed between 1961 and 1962, and no extensive renovations to the existing structure <br />have occurred since that time (TRC 2006). Asbestos-containing building materials have <br />been previously identified in the existing warehouse (TRC 2006). In addition, due to the <br />building's age, lead-based paint and/or lighting ballasts containing polychlorinated biphenyl <br />(PCB) may be present (TRC 2006). Mitigation Measure HM-1 would ensure that proper <br />disposal of any hazardous materials, if discovered, would be followed as directed by the City <br />of Santa Ana Building Division and Fire Department. Impacts are therefore considered less <br />than significant with mitigation incorporated. <br />Alton Court August 2007 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3-24 <br />J&S 00635.07 <br />75A-90 <br />