Laserfiche WebLink
i~ <br />i~ <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />1. Raise the height of the dam by 30 feet, build a new intake tower, and construct <br />improvements to the dam's outlet works (Mar 2003 -Sept 2003); <br />2. Construct dikes in the basin to protect property (Sept 2004 -Sept 2007); and <br />3. Raise the height of the adjacent spillway by 20 feet (Jul 2006 -Jan 2008) (U.S. Army <br />Corps of Engineers 2004). <br />The proposed project includes the construction of 38 single-family residential units on 6 <br />acres. Therefore, the proposed project would place housing within a 100-year floodplain. <br />However, in the event of a dam failure, based on the distance to Prado Dam, the projected <br />depth of potential floodwaters (less than 1 foot), and the emergency warnings that would be <br />issued in the event of dam failure, the project would not expose people or structures to a <br />significant risk. Impacts would be less than significant. <br />F. Less Than Significant Impact. The project would involve the construction of 38 single- <br />family residential units on 6 acres. As stated above, although the proposed project is located <br />within the 100-year floodplain, improvements to Prado Dam would limit impacts to the project <br />site. Therefore, existing structures on the project site would not impede or redirect flood <br />flows. Impacts would be less than significant. <br />G. Less Than Significant Impact. As stated previously under Section VIII-E, the proposed <br />project is within the 100-year floodplain; however, improvements to Prado Dam would limit <br />impacts to the project site. Impacts would be less than significant. <br />IX. Land Use and Planning <br />A. No Impact. The proposed project involves the construction of 38 single-family residential <br />units and redesignation of the project site to comply with zoning, land use, and the new <br />Specific Development Design standards. The amended zoning and land use designations for <br />the project site would generally be compatible with the adjacent residential and commercial <br />uses. The construction of 38 single-family residential units and the revised zoning and land <br />use designations associated with the proposed project would not divide the existing <br />community. No impacts would occur. <br /> <br />u <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />B. Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is zoned as Arterial Commercial (C5). <br />Residential units are incompatible with this zoning; therefore, the City is proposing a zone <br />amendment to a Specific Development No. 81 designation, which will allow the proposed <br />project. After the zone amendment and Specific Development Plan, the zoning would be <br />compatible with the proposed project for residential units, and less-than-significant impacts <br />would occur. <br />C. No Impact. The proposed project is located in an urbanized setting, and no locally <br />designated species or natural communities are known to exist in the project area. The site is <br />not part of any habitat conservation plan or natural community preservation plan. Therefore, <br />no impacts would occur. <br />X. Mineral Resources <br />Alton Court <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />3-29 <br />August 2007 <br />J&S OD635.07 <br />~ 75A-95 <br />